Validation of homogeneous assays for HDL-cholesterol using fresh samples from healthy and diseased subjects

Takashi Miida1, Kunihiro Nishimura2, Tomonori Okamura3

  • 1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Atherosclerosis
|February 18, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Homogeneous assays for high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) generally agree with reference methods in patients, though accuracy varies in those with very low HDL-C or abnormal composition.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Cardiovascular Risk Assessment
  • Biomarker Validation

Background:

  • High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) is a key negative risk factor for cardiovascular events.
  • Accurate measurement of HDL-C is crucial for risk stratification.
  • Validation of available homogeneous HDL-C assays is needed, especially in diverse patient populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the agreement between homogeneous HDL-C assays and reference measurement procedures (RMPs).
  • To assess assay accuracy in both healthy individuals and subjects with various diseases.

Main Methods:

  • Compared HDL-C concentrations from 12 homogeneous assays against RMPs (ultracentrifugation/heparin-manganese precipitation).
  • Analyzed fresh clinical samples from 48 healthy subjects and 119 subjects with disease.
  • Assessed assay performance using bias, total error, and correlation analyses.

Main Results:

  • Most homogeneous assays demonstrated excellent precision (CVs <2.23%).
  • Nine reagents met National Cholesterol Education Program total error requirements in healthy subjects; six met them in subjects with disease.
  • Agreement with RMPs was generally good, with most biases within ±1.0%, but some reagents showed significant errors in specific patient groups.

Conclusions:

  • Homogeneous HDL-C assays largely agree with reference methods in subjects with common diseases.
  • Accuracy may be compromised in individuals with extremely low HDL-C levels or abnormal HDL particle composition.
  • Three specific reagents showed notable discrepancies requiring further investigation.
Abstract