Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

376
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
376

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Machine Learning Approach to Prioritize Place-Based Prevention to Address Cardiovascular Disease Burden in New York City.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same author

Critical feedback impacts creative ideation and brain oscillations.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

Semantic processing of regional varieties in native Spanish listeners: the role of accent familiarity.

Brain and language·2025
Same author

CAP: The creativity assessment platform for online testing and automated scoring.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Neural mechanisms of face cue predictability and the integration of facial and acoustic cues in native- and nonnative-accented words.

Brain and language·2025
Same author

Creativity supports learning through associative thinking.

NPJ science of learning·2025
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
08:17

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 12, 2018

10.1K

ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing.

Darren Tanner1, Janet G Van Hell2

  • 1Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

Neuropsychologia
|February 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in brain responses to grammar reveal multiple neurocognitive routes for language comprehension. Understanding these variations is key to understanding general language processing.

Keywords:
ERPsFamilial sinistralityIndividual differencesLANMorphosyntaxN400P600

More Related Videos

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
04:30

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

5.3K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
08:17

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 12, 2018

10.1K
An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
04:30

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

5.3K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Morphosyntactic processing is crucial for language comprehension.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) are used to study neural responses to grammatical structures.
  • Previous research often assumes uniform neural responses to grammatical violations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate individual differences in the neural mechanisms underlying morphosyntactic processing.
  • To examine the variability in event-related potential (ERP) responses to grammatical violations.
  • To explore the neurocognitive routes involved in grammatical comprehension.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to record brain activity in monolingual English speakers.
  • Analyzed individual ERP responses to grammatical violations, moving beyond grand-mean analysis.
  • Investigated the topographical distribution and component overlap of ERPs.

Main Results:

  • Observed systematic individual variation in ERP responses, ranging from negativity-dominant to positivity-dominant patterns.
  • Found that the left anterior negativity (LAN) can be a variant of the N400 component.
  • Demonstrated that the apparent biphasic LAN-P600 pattern can arise from overlapping neural components (N400 and P600) in different individuals.

Conclusions:

  • Biphasic ERP waveforms do not always represent distinct processing stages within individuals.
  • Individual differences in neural substrates suggest multiple neurocognitive pathways for grammatical comprehension.
  • Quantifying individual differences provides crucial insights into general language processing mechanisms.