Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
How has the Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio regulation affected insurer behavior?
Jean M Abraham1, Pinar Karaca-Mandic, Kosali Simon
1*Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota †Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota and NBER, Minneapolis, MN ‡School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University and NBER, Bloomington, IN.
Background:
Starting in 2011, the Affordable Care Act stipulates that insurers meet the minimum medical loss ratio (MLR) standards or issue rebates. An MLR is the proportion of premium revenues spent on clinical benefits, and must be at least 80% in the individual and small-group markets. Although some insurers have issued rebates, it is unclear whether they also adjusted MLRs and their components in ways to move toward compliance.
Objective:
To investigate early responses of individual and small-group insurers' MLR-related outcomes to the Affordable Care Act provisions.
Research Design:
Descriptive and multivariate analyses using 2010-2011 data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and other sources.
Measures:
Outcomes include MLRs, MLR components (claims incurred, premiums earned, quality improvement expenses, and fraud detection/recovery expenses), and administrative expenses.
Results:
In 2010, only 44.3% of individual market insurers reported MLRs of at least the stipulated level; by 2011, this percentage was 63.2%. Among small-group insurers, 74.9% had 2010 MLRs at or above the stipulated level, with little change in 2011. Individual insurers with 2010 MLRs >10 percentage points below the minimum exhibited the largest increases in MLRs, with changes occurring through increases in claims and indirectly through decreases in administrative expenses.
Conclusions:
Early responses to MLR regulation seem more pronounced in the individual versus small-group market, with insurers using both direct and indirect strategies for compliance. Because insurers learned of final MLR regulations only in late 2010, early responses may be limited and skewed more toward greater use of rebates than other adjustments.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care I
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Relative Risk
Standards of Care II
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...

