Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

712
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
712
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

419
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
419
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

627
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
627
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.6K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.6K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

407
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
407
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.4K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Home Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake in a Large Community-Based General Screening Population.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

An approach to nonparametric inference on the causal dose-response function.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same author

Achieving timely treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: Factors associated with delayed surgical resection and proposed quality benchmarks.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

Prediabetes, obesity and risk for incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A large-scale contemporary cohort study.

American journal of preventive cardiology·2026
Same author

Sequential invitations to FOBT screening and colorectal cancer incidence.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Powering RCTs for Marginal Effects With GLMs Using Prognostic Score Adjustment.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.7K

Targeted learning in real-world comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.

Romain Neugebauer1, Julie A Schmittdiel, Mark J van der Laan

  • 1Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, U.S.A.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 19, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation (TMLE) with Super Learning (SL) effectively adjusts for biases in comparative effectiveness research using real-world data. This advanced method improves estimation efficiency for time-varying treatments in observational studies.

Keywords:
comparative effectivenessdiabetesefficiency gaininverse probability weightingmarginal structural modeltargeted learning

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

6.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.7K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

6.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Comparative effectiveness research (CER) often analyzes survival outcomes with time-varying interventions using observational data.
  • Standard regression models struggle with time-dependent confounders and informative censoring in CER.
  • Inverse probability weighting (IPW) for marginal structural models (MSMs) is a common bias adjustment technique.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation (TMLE) with Super Learning (SL) as an alternative to IPW for bias adjustment in CER.
  • To assess the feasibility and performance of TMLE within nonparametric MSMs using electronic health record (EHR) data.
  • To compare TMLE and IPW in estimating cumulative risks for treatment intensification strategies in type 2 diabetes.

Main Methods:

  • Application of TMLE with SL within nonparametric MSMs.
  • Analysis of large-scale EHR data for type 2 diabetes treatment strategies.
  • Validation using randomized experiment data as a gold standard.
  • Bootstrapping for standard error estimation.
  • Simulation studies to confirm double-robustness.

Main Results:

  • TMLE with SL is feasible for real-world CER using large healthcare databases.
  • TMLE and SL demonstrated effective adjustment for confounding and selection bias.
  • TMLE offers improved estimation efficiency compared to traditional methods.
  • Simulation studies confirmed TMLE's double-robustness property.

Conclusions:

  • TMLE with SL is a viable and efficient approach for bias adjustment in CER with time-varying exposures.
  • This methodology enhances the reliability of causal inference from observational health data.
  • TMLE and SL are recommended for improving estimation in complex real-world CER studies.