Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same author

"Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word": The Influence of Emojis on Willingness to Forgive.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

How visual eccentricity shapes conflict via target and distractor processing in the Simon task.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Expecting the unexpected: Examining the interplay between real-world knowledge and contextual cues during language comprehension.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Introspection about forced and free choice: Accurate subjective time estimation for externally as well as self-determined actions.

Consciousness and cognition·2024
Same author

The role of hyperbole in conveying emotionality: the case of victim speech.

Cognition & emotion·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.6K

Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs.

Ruth Filik1, Hartmut Leuthold2, Katie Wallington1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Nottingham.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|February 20, 2014
PubMed
Summary

The graded salience hypothesis explains how people understand irony. Unfamiliar ironies require more cognitive effort, showing distinct brain activity and eye movement patterns compared to familiar ironies.

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
06:49

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Published on: January 10, 2014

28.9K
Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
09:53

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

104

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.6K
Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
06:49

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Published on: January 10, 2014

28.9K
Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
09:53

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

104

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pragmatics

Background:

  • Limited understanding of ironic utterance comprehension.
  • Previous studies primarily compared ironic vs. non-ironic statements.
  • The graded salience hypothesis predicts differential processing for familiar and unfamiliar ironies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cognitive processes underlying the comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar ironic utterances.
  • To test the predictions of the graded salience hypothesis regarding ironic language processing.
  • To differentiate the neural and behavioral correlates of processing different types of irony.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Recorded participants' eye movements during reading of familiar/unfamiliar ironies and controls.
  • Experiment 2: Recorded participants' electrical brain activity (EEG) during listening to familiar/unfamiliar ironies and controls.
  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) like the N400 and late positivity.

Main Results:

  • Disruption in eye movements and an N400-like effect were observed specifically for unfamiliar ironies.
  • A late positivity effect was found for both familiar and unfamiliar ironies compared to controls.
  • Results support the graded salience hypothesis's predictions for processing unfamiliar ironic statements.

Conclusions:

  • Unfamiliar ironies elicit distinct processing costs, supporting the graded salience hypothesis.
  • The N400 effect suggests initial processing difficulties with novel ironic content.
  • Late positivity may reflect sustained conflict between literal and ironic interpretations.