Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

11:12
Optimization of a Multiplex RNA-based Expression Assay Using Breast Cancer Archival Material
Published on: August 1, 2018
8.9K
Genomic profiling in luminal breast cancer
Oleg Gluz1, Daniel Hofmann1, Rachel Würstlein2
1Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Bethesda Mönchengladbach GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Breast Care (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 20, 2014
Summary
Gene expression analysis helps classify hormone receptor-positive breast cancer into prognostic subgroups. This review critically appraises genomic signatures for luminal breast cancer, noting the lack of prospective trial evidence.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Gene expression analysis enables sub-classification of hormone receptor-positive (luminal) breast cancer into distinct prognostic subgroups.
- Current clinical practice utilizes prognostic signatures like the 21-gene Oncotype DX® and 70-gene Mammaprint® for luminal breast cancer sub-classification.
- The optimal method for this sub-classification remains undefined, with a lack of evidence from prospective clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically appraise widely used genomic signatures in luminal breast cancer.
- To review and evaluate evidence from retrospective and prospective trials regarding these genomic signatures.
- To address the current gap in understanding the optimal method for luminal breast cancer sub-classification.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search using Medline (accessed September 2013).
- Inclusion of abstracts from major oncology conferences: Annual Meeting of American Society of Clinical Oncology and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
- Critical appraisal of evidence supporting genomic signatures in luminal breast cancer.
Main Results:
- Identified widely used genomic signatures for luminal breast cancer sub-classification.
- Evaluated the existing evidence base, highlighting limitations and gaps.
- The review underscores the absence of definitive prospective trial data for optimal signature selection.
Conclusions:
- Genomic signatures offer prognostic sub-classification for luminal breast cancer.
- Further prospective trials are needed to establish the optimal genomic signature for clinical use.
- Current evidence necessitates careful consideration when applying genomic signatures in routine practice.

