Differences in virulence of pneumolysin and autolysin mutants constructed by insertion duplication mutagenesis and

Esther Yip-Mei Liu, Feng-Yee Chang, Jen-Chang Chang

  • 1Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11217, Taiwan. cpfung@vghtpe.gov.tw.

BMC Biotechnology
|February 25, 2014
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Target gene restoration (TGR) in insertion duplication mutagenesis (IDM) mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae can lead to inconsistent results. In-frame deletion (IFD) is a more reliable method for gene disruption studies.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Insertion duplication mutagenesis (IDM) and in-frame deletion (IFD) are standard techniques for gene function analysis.
  • Previous and current studies noted virulence discrepancies between IDM and IFD methods in Streptococcus pneumoniae, specifically for pneumolysin (ply) and autolysin (lytA) genes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the phenomenon of target gene restoration (TGR) in IDM mutants.
  • To compare the stability and reliability of IDM versus IFD for gene disruption in S. pneumoniae.
  • To assess the impact of TGR on experimental outcomes, particularly virulence studies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized IDM and IFD techniques to create mutants of S. pneumoniae (D39) targeting ply and lytA genes.
  • Employed Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR to detect and quantify TGR.
  • Confirmed TGR using Southern blot hybridization and Western blotting.
  • Assessed mutant virulence through median survival time in mice following intraperitoneal injection.

Main Results:

  • Target gene restoration (TGR) was observed in IDM mutants, even in the presence of antibiotics, while IFD mutants remained stable.
  • TGR occurred earlier in IDM mutants cultured with antibiotics (3-4 h) compared to non-supplemented media (4-5 h).
  • Mice injected with early-stage IDM mutants (3-h culture) showed significantly longer survival times than those injected with later-stage mutants (8-h culture), indicating a loss of mutant phenotype over time due to TGR.

Conclusions:

  • Target gene restoration (TGR) in IDM mutants necessitates careful monitoring to prevent inconsistent experimental results.
  • Misinterpretation of data due to undetected TGR can obscure significant biological findings.
  • In-frame deletion (IFD) is recommended as a more stable and preferable method for target gene disruption compared to IDM.