Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

11.8K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
11.8K
Conservation of Protein Domains02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains

2.9K
2.9K
Protein Families02:47

Protein Families

13.3K
Protein families are groups of homologous proteins; that is, they have similarities in amino acid sequences and three-dimensional structures. Protein families usually occur because of gene duplication, where an additional copy of a gene is inserted into the genome of an organism.   Mutations that change the amino acids but still allow the protein to be properly synthesized, will lead to new protein family members.   If these new proteins contain similar amino acids in key...
13.3K
Protein Families02:47

Protein Families

3.5K
3.5K
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

7.2K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
7.2K
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

9.0K
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolutionary and Functional Analysis of Caspase-8 and ASC Interactions to Drive Lytic Cell Death, PANoptosis.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

Bayesian identification of differentially expressed isoforms using a novel joint model of RNA-seq data.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

SPARC: Structural properties associated with residue constraints.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2022
Same author

Identifying Function Determining Residues in Neuroimmune Semaphorin 4A.

International journal of molecular sciences·2022
Same author

Correction to: A survey of TIR domain sequence and structure divergence.

Immunogenetics·2022
Same author

A Bayesian approach for accurate de novo transcriptome assembly.

Scientific reports·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Interactome-Seq: A Protocol for Domainome Library Construction, Validation and Selection by Phage Display and Next Generation Sequencing
12:04

Interactome-Seq: A Protocol for Domainome Library Construction, Validation and Selection by Phage Display and Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: October 3, 2018

8.3K

Evaluating, comparing, and interpreting protein domain hierarchies.

Andrew F Neuwald1

  • 1Institute for Genome Sciences and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology
|February 25, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces methods to statistically evaluate protein domain hierarchies, aiding evolutionary analysis and genome annotation. It quantifies hierarchical features to understand functional divergence and resolve conflicting classifications.

More Related Videos

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

16.2K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Interactome-Seq: A Protocol for Domainome Library Construction, Validation and Selection by Phage Display and Next Generation Sequencing
12:04

Interactome-Seq: A Protocol for Domainome Library Construction, Validation and Selection by Phage Display and Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: October 3, 2018

8.3K
Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

16.2K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Hierarchical arrangement of protein domain sequences into subgroups is crucial for evolutionary studies, similarity searches, function identification, and genome annotation.
  • Optimal hierarchies are often unclear, and independently derived hierarchies for the same domain can significantly differ, posing challenges in analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop methods for statistically evaluating specific aspects of protein domain hierarchies.
  • To probe the criteria underlying hierarchy construction and enable direct comparisons between different hierarchies.
  • To enhance understanding of protein domain functional divergence and resolve conflicts between competing hierarchies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing information-theoretical notions to quantify contributions of hierarchical features (subhierarchies, subgroups, sequences, signature patterns).
  • Employing graphical displays, including contribution plots, heat maps of residue conservation, and contrast alignments.
  • Implementing cross-mapping of subgroups between hierarchies for comparative analysis.

Main Results:

  • Quantified contributions of specific hierarchical features to the statistical model.
  • Visually displayed underlying properties through plots and heat maps, highlighting residue conservation patterns.
  • Facilitated direct comparison of subgroup structures between different hierarchies.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods provide a deeper understanding of protein domain functional divergence.
  • These approaches reveal uncertainties arising from inconsistent sequence conservation patterns.
  • The study helps resolve conflicts between competing protein domain hierarchies, improving classification accuracy.