Open surgery versus nonoperative treatments for paediatric trigger thumb: a systematic review

S Farr1, F Grill2, R Ganger2

  • 1Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Deformity Correction and Adult Foot & Ankle Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna, Speising, Austria sebastian.farr@oss.at.

Insights

Open surgery for paediatric trigger thumb reliably restores interphalangeal (IP) joint motion in 95% of children. Nonoperative treatments like splinting and exercising show lower success rates for this condition.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Paediatric trigger thumb is a common condition affecting the interphalangeal (IP) joint.
  • Treatment options include open surgical release, splinting, and passive exercising.
  • Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of these treatments is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and compare the outcomes of different treatment modalities for paediatric trigger thumb.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of open surgery, splinting, and passive exercising on interphalangeal joint motion.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of seven major databases.
  • Inclusion of studies with a minimum 12-month follow-up.
  • Analysis of data from 17 retrospective and 1 prospective study, encompassing 634 children for surgery, 115 for splinting, and 89 for exercising.

Main Results:

  • Open surgery achieved full IP joint motion in 95% of cases.
  • Continuous splinting resulted in full motion in 67% of children.
  • Passive exercising achieved full motion in 55% of children.

Conclusions:

  • Open surgical release appears to be the most effective treatment for paediatric trigger thumb, yielding reliable and rapid outcomes.
  • Nonoperative treatments demonstrate lower success rates compared to surgery.
  • Further high-quality research is needed due to the low level of evidence currently available.

Related Concept Videos