Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

376
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
376
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

963
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
963
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

383
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
383
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

77.8K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
77.8K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.5K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.5K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

5.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The primed Stroop is not a Stroop task: Evidence from delta plots.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

No Evidence for Unconscious Attentional Bias in People With Clinically Significant Symptoms of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Study Using the Emerging Electroencephalographic Paradigm of Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2025
Same author

Meaning composition in the processing of transposed-constituent compound nonwords.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Priming the distractor can eliminate the Stroop interference effect.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Taboo language across the globe: A multi-lab study.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

Cross-language morphological transfer in similar-script bilinguals.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
08:17

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 12, 2018

10.1K

Relatedness proportion effects in semantic categorization: reconsidering the automatic spreading activation process.

Bianca de Wit1, Sachiko Kinoshita1

  • 1ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Macquarie University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|February 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Semantic priming effects are not solely automatic. Our study shows trial relatedness proportion significantly impacts priming, suggesting evidence accumulation and source confusion, not just spreading activation.

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

4.7K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

19.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
08:17

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 12, 2018

10.1K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

4.7K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

19.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Semantic priming is often explained by automatic spreading activation.
  • This model predicts no influence of relatedness proportion on priming effects.
  • Previous research has not fully explored the role of proportion effects in semantic priming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of relatedness proportion on semantic priming.
  • To challenge the purely automatic spreading activation account of priming.
  • To explore alternative explanations for observed priming effects.

Main Methods:

  • A semantic categorization task ('Is this a living thing?') was employed.
  • The proportion of related prime-target pairs was systematically manipulated.
  • Response time distribution analysis was used to examine underlying processes.

Main Results:

  • A robust effect of relatedness proportion on the semantic priming effect was observed.
  • This effect was distinct from strategic prediction based on category/response congruence.
  • Response time distributions indicated processes beyond simple spreading activation.

Conclusions:

  • The semantic priming effect is influenced by the proportion of related trials.
  • Evidence accumulation and source confusion provide a better account than spreading activation.
  • These findings necessitate a revision of existing models of semantic priming.