Efficacy of a novel PCR- and microarray-based method in diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection

Leena Metso1, Minna Mäki, Päivi Tissari

  • 1Department of Orthopedics , Peijas Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital.

Acta Orthopaedica
|February 26, 2014
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

A new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microarray assay aids prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis during antimicrobial treatment. However, it offers no advantage over traditional culture when patients have not received prior antibiotics.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is crucial for pathogen detection and species identification.
  • Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) require accurate and timely diagnosis for effective treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a novel PCR and microarray-based platform for detecting bacteria in patients with suspected PJIs.
  • To compare the diagnostic performance of the new assay against microbiological culture and established diagnostic criteria.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study analyzed 142 samples from 61 suspected PJIs and 20 controls using the Prove-it Bone and Joint assay.
  • Results were compared with Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and microbiological culture findings.
  • Laboratory staff were blinded to clinical and culture results during assay analysis.

Main Results:

  • The PCR assay detected bacteria in 31 of 38 confirmed PJI cases, compared to 28 positive cultures.
  • In patients undergoing antimicrobial treatment for 4 or more days, PCR detected bacteria in 6 of 9 cases, while culture yielded positive results in only 2.
  • All control samples tested negative via PCR, with 6 false-positive PCR results observed among the suspected PJI cases.

Conclusions:

  • The Prove-it PCR and microarray assay demonstrates utility in diagnosing PJIs, particularly in patients receiving concurrent antimicrobial therapy.
  • The assay did not provide additional diagnostic information compared to standard culture methods in the absence of prior antimicrobial treatment.