Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
Published on: November 17, 2023
Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle
Fatma El-Zahraa Salah El-Deen Yassin1, Eman M S Muhammad1, Mohammed Zaki2
1Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Background:
Histopathological differentiation between BCH and HGPIN in prostatic needle biopsies is a diagnostic challenge. The gold standard for detection of HGPIN and BCH is histopathological examination; however subjectivity in interpretation and tiny volume of obtained tissue hamper reliable diagnosis.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to assess usefulness of using the p63 and p504s to solve this problem. Although the use of p63 and p504s is now well established in differentiation between preneoplastic and neoplastic prostatic lesions, their usefulness in tiny tissue material is, however, not fully studied.
Methods:
The study included a spectrum of 30 prostatic needle biopsies (5 BCH, 10 HGPIN, 10 indefinite luminal proliferations where BCH and HGPIN could not be distinguished from each other and 5 adenocarcinomas). H&E stained sections were examined for histopathological features. Other sections were stained immunohistochemically with p63 and p504s.
Results:
The mean age of patients was 69 (SD=7.6) years. PSA range was 1.3-2.7 ng/ml. Ultrasongraphic findings were unremarkable. All BCH showed p504s-/p63+ pattern, All HGPIN had p504s+/p63+ pattern while carcinomas were p504s+/p63-. After immunostaining combined with histopathological features; the 10 indefinite specimens could be diagnosed as 4 BCH and 6 HGPIN. The article explains how applying this staining pattern on the challenging specimens, combined with histopathological features, can be helpful in proper identification of prostatic proliferations.
