Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Change in keratometry after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy
Gene Kim1, Steven M Christiansen1, Majid Moshirfar1
1From the John A. Moran Eye Center (Kim, Christiansen, Moshifar), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, and the Ruiz Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Kim), University of Texas Medical School at Houston, and the Robert Cizik Eye Clinic (Kim), Houston, Texas, USA.
Purpose:
To compare the change in keratometry (K), spherical equivalent (SE), and visual acuity after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
Setting:
Academic tertiary care center.
Design:
Retrospective review.
Methods:
The postoperative K, SE, and uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities were measured 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 to 5 years, 6 to 7 years, and 8+ years postoperatively. A difference (Δ) for each variable was calculated from its 6-month postoperative baseline. The rates of change were grouped based on the magnitude of myopic correction (0.00 to 2.99 diopters [D]; 3.00 to 5.99 D; 6.00 to 8.99 D), type of surgery (LASIK versus PRK), and age (<34 years; 34 to 45 years; >45 years).
Results:
Statistically significant differences were found in the rates of change between low and moderate corrections to high corrections for ΔKavg (P=.0472 and P=.0091, respectively) and ΔSE (both P<.0001). Statistically significant differences were found in the rate of change in ΔKavg between all 3 ages groups (P=.0330, P=.0051, and P<.0001) and in ΔSE between ages less than 34 years and 34 to 45 years to ages over 45 years (P=.0158 and P=.0015, respectively). There was no significant difference in the rate of change in ΔKavg and ΔSE between LASIK and PRK (P=.3599 and P=.9403, respectively).
Conclusion:
There was keratometric and refractive regression for myopic LASIK, with the rate of regression depending on treatment magnitude and age.
Financial Disclosure:
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
07:29Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015