Comparison of short-term outcomes after carotid artery stenting according to different stent designs

Muslum Sahin1, Göksel Açar1, Birol Ozkan1

  • 1Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Insights

Closed-cell stents show a lower incidence of ischemic stroke after carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared to open-cell designs. This suggests closed-cell stents may be preferable for patients with high embolism risk.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Interventional Neurology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Stroke is a leading cause of death in developed nations.
  • Stents are known to reduce embolism risk, but optimal stent design for periprocedural complications remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the 1-month outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) using open-cell versus closed-cell stent designs.

Main Methods:

  • A study of 290 patients undergoing CAS, divided into open-cell (n=144) and closed-cell (n=138) stent groups.
  • All patients received neuroprotection with a distal protection device.
  • Outcomes assessed included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), transient cerebral ischemia, hypotension, and stroke at 1 month.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in MACCE or transient cerebral ischemia rates between stent groups.
  • Ischemic stroke incidence was significantly lower in the closed-cell stent group (0% vs. 2.77%, p=0.04).
  • Periprocedural hypotension was more frequent in the closed-cell stent group (7.2% vs. 2.1%, p=0.04).

Conclusions:

  • Closed-cell stents are associated with a reduced rate of ischemic stroke following CAS.
  • These findings suggest closed-cell stents may be a preferred option for patients at elevated risk of embolism.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos