Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Risk factors associated with emergency peripartum hysterectomy
Rong Jin1, Yuna Guo1, Yan Chen1
1Department of Obstetrics, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China.
Background:
Use of an emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) as a lifesaving measure to manage intractable postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) appears to be increasing recently around the world, and the indications for EPH have changed. The object of this study is to identify risk factors associated with EPH.
Methods:
We conducted a case-control study of 21 patients who underwent EPH because of intractable PPH between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2013, at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine (IPMCH). The parametric t-test, chi-square tests and Logistic regression models were used for analysis to identify the risk factors. The results were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.
Results:
There were 89 178 deliveries during the study period. Twenty-one women had an EPH, with an incidence of 24 per 100 000 deliveries. The loss of blood during postpartum hemorrhage of the EPH group was (5 060.7 ± 3 032.6) ml, and that of the control group was (2 040.8 ± 723.5) ml. There was a significant difference of PHH between the EHP group and the control group (P = 0.001). Independent risk factors for EPH from a logistic regression model were: disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (OR: 9.9, 95% CI 2.8-34, P = 0.003), previous cesarean section (OR: 5.27; 95% CI: 1.48-17.9, P = 0.009), placenta previa (OR: 6.9; 95% CI 1.6-2.9, P = 0.008), the loss of PPH (OR: 1.001; 95% CI 1.001-1.002, P = 0.002), placenta accreta (OR: 68; 95% CI 10-456, P = 0.004), the use of tocolytic agents prenatally (OR: 6.55, 95%CI 1.34-32.1,P = 0.049), and fetal macrosomia (OR: 6.9, 95% CI 1.25-38, P = 0.049).
Conclusion:
Significant risk factors of EPH are DIC, placenta previa, PPH, previous cesarean delivery, and placenta accrete, the use of tocolytic agents prenatally, and fetal macrosomia.
More Related Videos
05:21Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025
03:01Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Disorders of the Female Reproductive System
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...