Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

627
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
627
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

357
The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
357
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

712
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
712
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.7K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

10.2K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
10.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A primer on equivalence (negligible effect) testing.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

An Investigation of a Community-Based Phase-I Online Group Trauma Intervention.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2026
Same author

Data from an International Multi-Centre Study of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties and Related Variables in University Students (the SMARVUS Dataset).

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

Navigating the Bayes maze: The psychologist's guide to Bayesian statistics, a hands-on tutorial with R code.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2024
Same author

Equivalence Testing Based Fit Index: Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual.

Multivariate behavioral research·2024
Same author

Evaluating the performance of existing and novel equivalence tests for fit indices in structural equation modelling.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2023
Same journal

Dropping out of therapy in context of an RCT: a qualitative analysis.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2026
Same journal

Are current interventions effective in alleviating multidimensional perfectionism in children and adolescents? A meta-analytic review.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2026
Same journal

Assessing microprocess clinical discrimination in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A vignette-based approach with expert consensus and sensitivity to structured exposure.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2026
Same journal

Preventive intervention with mentalization-based treatment for parents of young children with parenting difficulties in China: An RCT of lighthouse parenting program.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2026
Same journal

Examining specificity in psychotherapy: Open/hidden administration of alliance in experimentally induced guilt.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2026
Same journal

Adherence to elements of metacognition-based therapy for schizophrenia moderates the negative association between therapist-perceived rupture intensity and the client's session evaluation.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

13.6K

Assessing clinical significance using robust normative comparisons.

Haykaz Mangardich1, Robert A Cribbie

  • 1a Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.

Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research
|March 1, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Assessing clinical significance with normative comparisons is crucial. The robust Schuirmann-Yuen test offers a more reliable method for determining treatment effectiveness in clinical groups compared to traditional approaches.

Keywords:
assumptionsclinical significancedepressioninterventionnormalitynormative comparisonsvariance homogeneity

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

90.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

13.6K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

90.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research

Background:

  • Clinical significance evaluation is vital for assessing intervention impact on clients' lives.
  • Normative comparisons, contrasting treated groups with healthy populations, are a key method for group-level clinical significance analysis.
  • Existing methods may be sensitive to violations of statistical assumptions like normality and homogeneity of variance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the analytical and practical utility of normative comparisons for clinical significance assessment.
  • To showcase a robust method for normative comparisons that is resilient to violations of normality and homogeneity of variance assumptions.
  • To compare the performance of a robust statistical test against traditional methods in determining group equivalency.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized six datasets from published intervention studies focusing on depression.
  • Employed the Schuirmann-Yuen test, a robust procedure for equivalence testing.
  • Compared the outcomes of the Schuirmann-Yuen test with the traditional Schuirmann test of equivalence.

Main Results:

  • The robust Schuirmann-Yuen test identified equivalency in 11% fewer clinical samples compared to the standard Schuirmann test.
  • This finding highlights potential differences in conclusions based on the chosen statistical method for normative comparisons.
  • The robust test demonstrated its capacity to provide more conservative and potentially more accurate assessments of clinical significance.

Conclusions:

  • The Schuirmann-Yuen procedure is recommended for researchers conducting normative comparisons.
  • This method offers enhanced reliability for determining if a treated clinical group is equivalent to a normative comparison group.
  • Adopting the Schuirmann-Yuen test can lead to more rigorous and dependable conclusions regarding intervention effectiveness.