Safety comes first: are doctors attentive enough to their initial clinical assessment notes?
Abstract:
Accurate hospital admission/initial history and physical examination [H&P] notes are vital to support patient care. We aimed to assess the quality of H&P notes and to compare medical/surgical, and inpatient/outpatient H&P notes. A cross-sectional study examined 154 initial H&P notes for the adherence to a standard protocol in a tertiary referral hospital. 134 doctors (87.1%) adhered to the correct layout in accordance with the standard. Only 77 doctors (50%) recorded the names of the patient's medications. 106 (68.8%) documented the allergy status. Six doctors (3.9%) omitted an objective record of their own identity. Surgeons were superior at recording admission type (p = 0.0001) and past surgical history (p = 0.002) only. The data in this study show that the standard o completeness of the H&P documentation among doctors is suboptimal. We recommend the introduction of a standardised H&P template to reduce errors.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Data Reporting and Recording
Obedience
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...


