The informed consent in Southern Italy does not adequately inform parents about infant vaccination
Francesco Attena1, Amanda Valdes Abuadili, Sara Marino
1Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138 Naples, Italy. francesco.attena@unina2.it.
Insights
Parents often lack information about optional vaccines in Italy's hexavalent vaccine. Consent forms did not ensure parents understood which childhood immunizations were mandatory or optional.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Immunization
Background:
- Hexavalent vaccine in Campania, Italy, includes mandatory (diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, Hepatitis B) and optional (pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type B) components.
- Informed consent is crucial for optional vaccines, requiring clear communication to parents.
- Study investigates parental understanding and consent for optional vaccines in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate parental receipt, signing, and comprehension of informed consent for hexavalent vaccines.
- Assess parental awareness of mandatory versus optional vaccines within the hexavalent formulation.
- Determine if healthcare providers informed parents about non-mandatory vaccine components.
Main Methods:
- Survey of 1039 parents at four vaccination centers in Campania, Italy.
- Analysis of collected informed consent forms for clarity and completeness.
- Interviews with parents regarding their understanding of vaccine components and consent.
Main Results:
- Only 58.1% of parents received consent forms, and 52.8% signed them; only 35.0% read the forms.
- A significant majority of parents (98.5%) were unaware of the non-mandatory pertussis and H. influenzae type B vaccines.
- No healthcare providers informed parents about the non-mandatory vaccines administered.
Conclusions:
- Current consent procedures fail to adequately inform parents about vaccine options.
- Healthcare providers did not effectively communicate information regarding non-mandatory vaccines.
- Improved informed consent processes are needed to ensure parental understanding of childhood immunizations.
Background:
Vaccination centres in the Campania Region, southern Italy, vaccinate children with a hexavalent vaccine that contains the mandatory vaccines diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, and viral Hepatitis B. This vaccine also includes two non-mandatory vaccines, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type B. Information about these optional vaccines should be communicated to the parents, and informed consent should be obtained from parents before vaccination. We explored whether informed consent was delivered to the parents, whether they signed the consent form, and whether they read and acquired the information about the vaccination that their child would receive.
Methods:
Childhood immunisations are provided at specific public health vaccination centres, "Unità Operative Materno-infantili's" (UOMIs). We selected four UOMI from the Campania Region where we interviewed 1039 parents bringing their children for the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd doses of hexavalent vaccine. The consent forms were collected from the four vaccination centres and were analysed with respect to clarity and completeness.
Results:
Most of the respondents (89.5%) were mothers between 20 and 39 years of age (80.4% vs 59.6% of the fathers), they were married (87.2% vs 93.5% of the fathers), and only one-half of them were employed (50.2% vs 92.6% of the fathers). The informed consent form was received from 58.1% of the parents and signed by 52.8%, but read by 35.0% of them. Only 1.5% of parents knew which vaccines were mandatory, and 25.0% of them believed that the entire hexavalent vaccine was mandatory. When we asked the parents which non-mandatory vaccinations were administered to their children, only 0.5% indicated the Haemophilus influenzae type B and none indicated the pertussis vaccine. Thirty-six per cent of the parents replied that their child had not received any non-mandatory vaccines. No parents were informed by the operators that their children would receive non-mandatory vaccines.
Conclusion:
In our study, consent procedures did not allow parents to acquire correct information about vaccine options for their children. Furthermore, not one health care provider informed parents that their child was receiving non-mandatory vaccines. The informed consent process and the individual health care providers did not properly inform parents about the vaccines administered to their children.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Vaccines
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children


