Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026
Three-dimensional Inflammatory Human Tissue Equivalents of Gingiva
Published on: April 3, 2018
On the relationship between gingival biotypes and gingival thickness in young Caucasians
Kai R Fischer1,2, Timo Richter3, Moritz Kebschull4
1Unit of Periodontology, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
Objectives:
To evaluate a possible relationship between gingival biotypes and gingival thickness, papilla height and gingival width.
Material And Methods:
Thirty-six adult subjects were stratified by their gingival biotype (GB), as defined by transparency of a periodontal probe through the buccal gingival margin, into "thin" (18 subjects) and "thick" (18 subjects) GB. Out of these, extreme cases (6 "very thin", 6 "very thick") were identified. Four different parameters were assessed: gingival thickness (GT), papilla height (PH), probing depth (PD) and gingival width (GW).
Results:
When comparing "thin" and "thick" GB, midfacial GT (0.40 ± 0.07 vs. 0.72 ± 0.11 mm; P < 0.0001), PH (3.76 ± 0.50 vs. 3.95 ± 0.41 mm, P = 0.02) and GW (3.01 ± 1.26 vs. 4.63 ± 0.86 mm, P = 0.04) were lower in the "thin" GB group. Further stratification into moderately and extremely "thin"/"thick" GB eliminated the differences between the moderate groups.
Conclusion:
Our data support the traditional hypothesis that two different gingival biotypes with concomitant properties distinguishable by gingival transparency exist. In addition, we provide evidence that an alternative classification into "very thick", "moderate" and "very thin" biotypes might be advantageous, because the unique properties were seemingly primarily driven by subjects with extreme values.
