Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.1K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.1K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

1.1K
1.1K
Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

70.6K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
70.6K
Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

21.6K
21.6K
Histone Modification02:32

Histone Modification

14.6K
The histone proteins have a flexible N-terminal tail extending out from the nucleosome. These histone tails are often subjected to post-translational modifications such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination. Particular combinations of these modifications form “histone codes” that influence the chromatin folding and tissue-specific gene expression.
Acetylation
The enzyme histone acetyltransferase adds acetyl group to the histones. Another enzyme, histone...
14.6K
Histone Modification02:32

Histone Modification

4.0K
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring feature limitations in antimicrobial resistance prediction: machine learning and deep learning in A. baumannii.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Integrating pavement condition records with LLM-based crash narrative analysis for pavement safety assessment.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

SynergyGraph: predicting cell line specific drug combination synergy scores using knowledge graph representation and hypergraph modeling.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

SiaScoreNet: a siamese neural network-based model integrating prediction scores for HLA-peptide interaction prediction.

Bioinformatics advances·2025
Same author

PHLA-SiNet: A novel peptide-HLA binding prediction model using heterogeneous Siamese neural networks.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

SimPep and OP-AND: A deep learning framework and curated database for predicting osteogenic peptides.

PLoS computational biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

10.7K

Transcription factor binding sites prediction based on modified nucleosomes.

Mohammad Talebzadeh1, Fatemeh Zare-Mirakabad1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, AmirKabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Plos One
|March 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces novel features from modified nucleosomes to improve transcription factor binding site (TFBS) prediction, significantly reducing false positives compared to traditional methods.

More Related Videos

Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFRα+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis
12:29

Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFRα+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis

Published on: April 16, 2018

8.2K
Genome-Wide Mapping of Histone Modifications and Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Neuroendocrine Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines Using CUT&RUN
11:50

Genome-Wide Mapping of Histone Modifications and Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Neuroendocrine Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines Using CUT&RUN

Published on: April 3, 2026

112

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

10.7K
Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFRα+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis
12:29

Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFRα+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis

Published on: April 16, 2018

8.2K
Genome-Wide Mapping of Histone Modifications and Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Neuroendocrine Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines Using CUT&RUN
11:50

Genome-Wide Mapping of Histone Modifications and Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Neuroendocrine Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines Using CUT&RUN

Published on: April 3, 2026

112

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics
  • Epigenetics

Background:

  • Position weight matrices (PWMs) are standard for transcription factor binding site (TFBS) prediction but yield many false positives.
  • Existing methods use sequence conservation or proximity to transcription start sites to improve TFBS prediction accuracy.
  • The spatial distribution of modified nucleosomes correlates with promoter architecture and DNA accessibility for transcription factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance TFBS prediction accuracy by incorporating features related to modified nucleosome patterns.
  • To develop a computational model that reduces false positive predictions in TFBS discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed two new features: 'modified nucleosomes neighboring' and 'modified nucleosomes occupancy'.
  • Developed a logistic regression classifier integrating these features with PWMs for TFBS probability estimation.
  • Investigated 21 histone modifications, identifying 8 strongly correlated with TFBSs, and validated the model on multiple transcription factors (Sp1, MAZ, PU.1, ELF1).

Main Results:

  • The proposed model demonstrated improved prediction of transcription factor binding regions compared to PWMs alone.
  • Identified specific histone modifications significantly associated with transcription factor binding.
  • The model showed effectiveness across different transcription factors, indicating broad applicability.

Conclusions:

  • Incorporating modified nucleosome data significantly enhances TFBS prediction accuracy and reduces false positives.
  • The developed model offers a more successful and versatile approach to genome-wide TFBS prediction.
  • The method's simplicity and adaptability make it a superior tool for computational TFBS analysis.