Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
EVALUATING COSTS WITH UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING: A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT EFFECT
Elizabeth A Handorf1, Justin E Bekelman2, Daniel F Heitjan2
1Fox Chase Cancer Center.
Estimating treatment costs from observational data can be biased by unmeasured factors. This study developed a method to adjust for such biases, finding treatment effect significance sensitive to unmeasured confounders.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Biostatistics
- Cancer Treatment Analysis
Background:
- Observational studies estimating treatment cost effects are vulnerable to bias from unmeasured confounders.
- Assessing the potential magnitude of such biases is crucial for reliable cost-effectiveness analyses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive a general adjustment formula for loglinear models of mean cost to account for unmeasured confounders.
- To assess the performance and robustness of this adjustment method through simulation.
- To apply the method to real-world data for bladder cancer treatment cost evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Derivation of a general adjustment formula for loglinear models of mean cost.
- Exploration of special cases under various assumptions for unmeasured confounder distributions.
- Simulation studies to evaluate adjustment performance, focusing on robustness to conditional independence assumptions.
- Application to SEER-Medicare cost data for stage II/III muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Main Results:
- The derived adjustment formula provides a method to quantify bias from unmeasured confounders in cost estimation.
- Simulation results demonstrate the method's performance and its robustness under specific assumptions.
- Analysis of bladder cancer data indicates that the significance of treatment effects (radical cystectomy vs. chemoradiation) is sensitive to potential unmeasured confounders.
- Sensitivity analysis revealed that plausible Bernoulli, Poisson, and Gamma confounders can alter the observed treatment effect significance.
Conclusions:
- The developed adjustment method is valuable for addressing unmeasured confounding in health economic evaluations.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering unmeasured confounders when interpreting cost-effectiveness of cancer treatments.
- The sensitivity of treatment effect significance to unmeasured confounders underscores the need for careful study design and analysis in observational cost research.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blinding
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
