Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Noninvasive and Invasive Renal Hypoxia Monitoring in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: October 28, 2022
The relationship between hypophosphataemia and outcomes during low-intensity and high-intensity continuous renal
Rinaldo Bellomo1, Alan Cass2, Louise Cole3
1Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Aim:
To identify risk factors for development of hypophosphataemia in patients treated with two different intensities of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and to assess the independent association of hypophosphataemia with major clinical outcomes.
Materials And Methods:
We performed secondary analysis of data collected from 1441 patients during a large, multicentre randomised controlled trial of CRRT intensity. We allocated patients to two different intensities of CRRT (25mL/kg/hour vs 40 mL/kg/hour of effluent generation) and obtained daily measurement of serum phosphate levels.
Results:
We obtained 14 115 phosphate measurements and identified 462 patients (32.1%) with hypophosphataemia, with peak incidence on Day 2 and Day 3. With lower intensity CRRT, there were 58 episodes of hypophosphataemia/1000 patient days, compared with 112 episodes/1000 patient days with higher intensity CRRT (P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher intensity CRRT, female sex, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and hypokalaemia were independently associated with an increased odds ratio (OR) for hypophosphataemia. On multivariable models, hypophosphataemia was associated with better clinical outcomes, but when analysis was confined to patients alive at 96 hours, hypophosphataemia was not independently associated with clinical outcomes.
Conclusions:
Hypophosphataemia is common during CRRT and its incidence increases with greater CRRT intensity. Hypophosphataemia is not a robust independent predictor of mortality. Its greater incidence in the higher intensity CRRT arm of the Randomised Evaluation of Normal vs Augmented Level trial does not explain the lack of improved outcomes with such treatment.
More Related Videos
04:36Measurement of Tissue Oxygenation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
Published on: October 2, 2020
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction