Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

1.2K
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
1.2K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.5K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.5K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

9.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Front-back sound level differences for human heads and the 1000-Hz interaural level anomaly.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Localization of sound in rooms VI: Duplex theory.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Localization of tones in a room by moving listeners.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Matched transaural synthesis with probe microphones for psychoacoustical experiments.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2019
Same author

Noise edge pitch and models of pitch perception.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2019
Same author

A framework for testing and comparing binaural models.

Hearing research·2017
Same journal

Relationship between spontaneous EEG oscillations at 7 and 45 days of acute plateau exposure and the plateau acclimatization index.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Neuroprotective effects of paederoside against mitochondrial dysfunction in rotenone-induced cell models of Parkinson's disease.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Covariance-based analysis of spindle-band EEG during declarative and non-declarative odor cueing in sleep.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: Physiological determinants of cortical P100 responses in pattern visual evoked potentials: a scoping review.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor overflow: a systematic review in neurological disorders.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Advancing neurodegenerative disease biomarkers: the role of neuroimaging in TDP-43 and tau proteinopathies.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K

Anatomical limits on interaural time differences: an ecological perspective.

William M Hartmann1, Eric J Macaulay1

  • 1Psychoacoustics Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USA.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|March 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human sound localization relies on interaural time differences (ITD). This study reveals that ITD insensitivity at high frequencies may be an evolutionary defense, but requires smaller head sizes than currently observed.

Keywords:
binauralbrainstemevolutioninteraural time differencerotation-azimuth transformsound localizationspherical head model

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

16.5K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

16.5K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Bioacoustics

Background:

  • Humans and animals use interaural time differences (ITD) for sound localization.
  • Pure tones relate ITD to interaural phase difference (IPD), with known boundaries defining spatial perception regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To translate iso-IPD boundaries into azimuths using a spherical head model (SHM).
  • To quantitatively test an ecological interpretation of high-frequency ITD insensitivity.
  • To investigate the role of head size and binaural processing in sound localization.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a spherical head model (SHM) to translate iso-IPD boundaries.
  • Performed free-field measurements to validate model calculations.
  • Analyzed the relationship between head size, binaural processing, and ITD/inter-aural level differences (ILD).

Main Results:

  • Calculations suggest high-frequency ITD insensitivity is an evolutionary defense against misinformation, linked to brainstem processing limits.
  • This interpretation is valid only if binaural processing evolved for heads 50% smaller than adult heads.
  • Realistic head shapes slightly relax this size requirement.

Conclusions:

  • The discrepancy between current and ideal head sizes for ITD processing was resolved by central mechanisms prioritizing inter-aural level differences (ILD) at higher frequencies.
  • This highlights the adaptive evolution of auditory processing in response to physical constraints like head size.