Does tension-free vaginal tape and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator affect urodynamics? Comparison of the two techniques
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Transvaginal Mesh Insertion in the Ovine Model
Published on: July 27, 2017
F Gungor Ugurlucan1, H Ayyildiz Erkan2, C Yasa2
1Istanbul University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul, Turkey. fgungor@yahoo.com
Aim:
To evaluate the effects of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O) operations on urodynamics and subjective and objective outcomes.
Materials And Methods:
Thirty-six patients with stress or mixed urinary incontinence underwent TVT or TVT-O. Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS) Questionnaire-Scored Form, one-hour pad test, Q-tip test, perineometer, and urodynamics were performed before and after the operations. Blaivas-nomogram was used for assessment of postoperative voiding difficulty.
Results:
Nineteen patients underwent TVT-O and 17 patients underwent TVT. Mean follow-up was 18.4 +/- 6.8 months. There was no difference between two groups regarding demographic variables, degree of prolapse, type of incontinence, perineometer, Q-tip test, pad test, and urodynamics. There was a significant increase in the maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and residual volume in TVT-O group. According to Blaivas-nomogram, five patients had mild, one had medium obstruction in the TVT-O group, whereas one had mild and three had medium obstruction in TVT group. Two bladder perforations occurred during TVT. One patient developed groin pain after TVT-O.
Conclusions:
TVT-O may lead to an increase in MUCP and residual urine volume. TVT-O is as efficient as TVT and leads to milder obstruction when compared to TVT.
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

