New developments in the delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy: targeted lead placement, multi-site and
Manav Sohal1, Zhong Chen, Eva Sammut
1Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, Rayne Institute, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure outcomes, but one-third of patients do not respond. Optimizing CRT lead placement and exploring alternative pacing methods may improve patient response rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is established for heart failure with ventricular dyssynchrony.
- Current CRT response rates are suboptimal, with up to 33% of patients not benefiting.
- Existing guidelines for CRT lead placement may not be universally effective, especially in patients with cardiac scar tissue.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore strategies for improving CRT response rates in non-responders.
- To investigate the potential benefits of targeting the latest mechanically activating segment for left ventricular (LV) lead placement.
- To evaluate alternative CRT delivery methods, including multi-site and endocardial pacing.
Main Methods:
- Review of current CRT practices and outcomes.
- Analysis of emerging techniques for LV lead positioning, focusing on mechanical activation patterns.
- Examination of data from trials investigating multi-site and LV endocardial pacing.
Main Results:
- Empirical lead placement may be insufficient, particularly in patients with significant myocardial scar.
- Targeting the latest mechanically activating segment for LV lead placement shows potential benefit.
- Alternative pacing strategies like multi-site and endocardial pacing demonstrate promise.
Conclusions:
- A shift from solely relying on response prediction to optimizing CRT delivery is crucial.
- Personalized LV lead placement based on mechanical activation may enhance CRT efficacy.
- Investigating novel delivery methods offers a promising avenue to improve outcomes for CRT non-responders.
Abstract:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a proven treatment adjunct for selected patients with heart failure and evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony. When applying most contemporary guidelines the accepted response rate has remained static with up to one-third of patients failing to respond. Empiric lateral/posterolateral lead positioning may not be the optimal strategy in all patients, particularly in those with extensive scar and there have been developments that suggest an approach whereby the latest mechanically activating segment is targeted for left ventricular (LV) lead placement may be of some benefit. Additionally, alternative means of delivering CRT, either by means of multi-site pacing or LV endocardial pacing, have similarly shown promise. At a time where novel predictors of response to CRT have proved disappointing in multi-center trials, a paradigm shift away from prediction towards better delivery of CRT may potentially be of most benefit to the significant minority who do not respond.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy


