Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...

Magical Thinking

Magical Thinking

Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Correction: Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?

PloS one·2020

Same author

Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?

PloS one·2020

Same author

The four cultures: Public engagement with science only, art only, neither, or both museums.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2015

Same author

Escaping the impulse to immediate gratification: the prospect concept promotes a future-oriented mindset, prompting an inclination towards delayed gratification.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2012

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Relationship between scientific knowledge and fortune-telling.

Paichi Pat Shein¹, Yuh-Yuh Li², Tai-Chu Huang²

¹National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan taichu@mail.nsysu.edu.tw.

Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)

|March 7, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific knowledge has a complex relationship with fortune-telling. While knowledge of scientific methods decreases belief in fortune-telling, knowledge of facts correlates with engagement in practices like cognitive polyphasia.

Keywords:

public understanding of science representations of science science and popular culture scientific literacy social representations

More Related Videos

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Area of Science:

Sociology of Science
Cultural Anthropology
Science Communication

Background:

The relationship between scientific knowledge and non-scientific beliefs, such as fortune-telling, is complex.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective science communication and public engagement.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the association between scientific knowledge (facts and methods) and fortune-telling beliefs and practices.
To explore the phenomenon of cognitive polyphasia in the context of science and belief.

Main Methods:

A survey of 1863 Taiwanese adults.
Data collection on socio-demographic characteristics, scientific knowledge, and fortune-telling beliefs/practices.
Analysis using probability proportional to size sampling.

Main Results:

Knowledge of scientific methods showed a negative association with fortune-telling beliefs.
Knowledge of scientific facts was positively associated with engagement in fortune-telling practices.
This highlights cognitive polyphasia, where individuals hold seemingly contradictory beliefs.

Conclusions:

Scientific knowledge and fortune-telling beliefs are not mutually exclusive.
A culturally sensitive approach is needed to understand science's role alongside other knowledge systems.
Rethinking science communication strategies to acknowledge diverse belief systems is important.