Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Classification and Identification

Methods of Classification and Identification

Bacterial identification relies on a diverse array of techniques to classify and understand microorganisms, each tailored to uncover specific characteristics. Traditional morphological approaches, while still valuable, are limited for closely related or structurally simple organisms. Modern methods integrate biochemical, serological, genetic, and advanced molecular tools to achieve greater accuracy.Morphological and Biochemical TechniquesMorphological characteristics, such as cell shape and...

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

An Ergonomic Comparison of Data Entry Work Using a Keyboard vs. Touch Screen Input Device While Standing and Sitting.

Journal of ergonomics·2025

Same author

Upfront whole blood transcriptional patterns in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors associate with clinical outcome.

Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII·2025

Same author

First Malaria Vaccine RTS, S: A Step toward the Eradication of Malaria.

Archives of Razi Institute·2025

Same author

Preliminary observations in cortical excitability changes using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), it's correlation with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in subjects with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

Acta neurologica Belgica·2025

Same author

Exploring molecular fragments for fraction unbound in human plasma of chemicals: a fragment-based cheminformatics approach.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2024

Same author

Unveiling the potential of machine learning in cost-effective degradation of pharmaceutically active compounds: A stirred photo-reactor study.

Chemosphere·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Identification of Antibacterial Immunity Proteins in Escherichia coli using MALDI-TOF-TOF-MS/MS and Top-Down Proteomic Analysis

Identification of Antibacterial Immunity Proteins in Escherichia coli using MALDI-TOF-TOF-MS/MS and Top-Down Proteomic Analysis

Published on: May 23, 2021

Identifying bacterial fragments on morphologically similar substrate using UAFM.

A Bhattacharya¹, S Banerjee¹

¹Surface Physics Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700 64, India.

Micron (Oxford, England : 1993)

|March 8, 2014

Summary

Ultrasonic atomic force microscopy (UAFM) effectively maps surface elasticity, easily identifying biological fragments. This powerful technique overcomes limitations of standard AFM imaging for biological samples.

Keywords:

AFM Bacteria Elasticity Ultrasonic

More Related Videos

Contact Mode Atomic Force Microscopy as a Rapid Technique for Morphological Observation and Bacterial Cell Damage Analysis

Contact Mode Atomic Force Microscopy as a Rapid Technique for Morphological Observation and Bacterial Cell Damage Analysis

Published on: June 30, 2023

Rapid and Specific Detection of Acinetobacter baumannii Infections Using a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification/Cas12a-based System

Rapid and Specific Detection of Acinetobacter baumannii Infections Using a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification/Cas12a-based System

Published on: April 25, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Identification of Antibacterial Immunity Proteins in Escherichia coli using MALDI-TOF-TOF-MS/MS and Top-Down Proteomic Analysis

Identification of Antibacterial Immunity Proteins in Escherichia coli using MALDI-TOF-TOF-MS/MS and Top-Down Proteomic Analysis

Published on: May 23, 2021

Contact Mode Atomic Force Microscopy as a Rapid Technique for Morphological Observation and Bacterial Cell Damage Analysis

Contact Mode Atomic Force Microscopy as a Rapid Technique for Morphological Observation and Bacterial Cell Damage Analysis

Published on: June 30, 2023

Rapid and Specific Detection of Acinetobacter baumannii Infections Using a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification/Cas12a-based System

Rapid and Specific Detection of Acinetobacter baumannii Infections Using a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification/Cas12a-based System

Published on: April 25, 2025

Area of Science:

Surface science
Microscopy
Biophysics

Background:

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a common tool for surface imaging.
Interpreting morphological features of biological samples on substrates can be challenging with standard AFM.
Elasticity mapping offers complementary information to topographical data.

Purpose of the Study:

To demonstrate the effectiveness of Ultrasonic Atomic Force Microscopy (UAFM) for mapping surface elasticity.
To show UAFM's capability in identifying biological fragments on substrates.
To highlight the limitations of standard AFM in interpreting surface morphology.

Main Methods:

Utilizing Ultrasonic Atomic Force Microscopy (UAFM) to probe surface elasticity.
Comparing UAFM elasticity maps with standard AFM topographical images.
Employing the bacterium Pseudomonas sp. as a biological model system.

Main Results:

UAFM successfully mapped the elasticity of the substrate and biological fragments.
Biological fragments were clearly distinguished using UAFM, a task difficult with standard AFM.
Standard AFM images were shown to potentially misinterpret surface morphological features.

Conclusions:

UAFM is a powerful tool for studying biological samples.
Elasticity mapping via UAFM enhances the differentiation of morphological features on substrates.
UAFM provides crucial insights beyond topographical data in AFM analysis.