Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Blinded versus unblinded covariate selection in confirmatory survival trials
Christina Kunz1, Meinhard Kieser
1a Department of Biostatistics , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.
Abstract:
Adjustment for covariates and specification of the correct covariate set are important issues in the analysis of clinical trials. Edwards (1999) proposes a model selection approach where the model is chosen on the final data set, which remains blinded for treatment group allocation. We investigate this method for time-to-event endpoints and compare its performance to variable selection within an adaptive design. This adaptive design integrates the methods of Schäfer and Müller (2001) and Keiding et al. (1987) and allows variable selection on the unblinded data during an interim analysis. Monte Carlo simulation shows that Edwards' method-though blinded-outperforms the adaptive method in terms of ability to select the survival relevant covariates and power. The application of the methods is illustrated by a clinical trial example.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Censoring Survival Data
Blind Procedures
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

