Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Assessment of Global DNA Double-Strand End Resection using BrdU-DNA Labeling coupled with Cell Cycle Discrimination Imaging
Published on: April 28, 2021
RPA antagonizes microhomology-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks
Sarah K Deng1, Bryan Gibb2, Mariana Justino de Almeida1
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract:
Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) is a Ku- and ligase IV-independent mechanism for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks that contributes to chromosome rearrangements. Here we used a chromosomal end-joining assay to determine the genetic requirements for MMEJ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that end resection influences the ability to expose microhomologies; however, it is not rate limiting for MMEJ in wild-type cells. The frequency of MMEJ increased by up to 350-fold in rfa1 hypomorphic mutants, suggesting that replication protein A (RPA) bound to the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhangs formed by resection prevents spontaneous annealing between microhomologies. In vitro, the mutant RPA complexes were unable to fully extend ssDNA and were compromised in their ability to prevent spontaneous annealing. We propose that the helix-destabilizing activity of RPA channels ssDNA intermediates from mutagenic MMEJ to error-free homologous recombination, thus preserving genome integrity.
Insights
Replication protein A (RPA) prevents mutagenic DNA repair by limiting microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). This finding reveals RPA
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) repairs DNA double-strand breaks and can cause chromosome rearrangements.
- MMEJ is independent of Ku and ligase IV, key proteins in other DNA repair pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the genetic factors influencing MMEJ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
- To elucidate the role of replication protein A (RPA) in regulating MMEJ.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a chromosomal end-joining assay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
- Analyzed MMEJ frequency in wild-type and rfa1 hypomorphic mutants.
- Performed in vitro assays with mutant RPA complexes.
Main Results:
- End resection exposes microhomologies but is not rate-limiting for MMEJ in wild-type cells.
- MMEJ frequency increased up to 350-fold in rfa1 mutants.
- Mutant RPA complexes showed defects in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) extension and annealing prevention.
Conclusions:
- RPA bound to ssDNA overhangs inhibits spontaneous microhomology annealing, preventing mutagenic MMEJ.
- RPA's helix-destabilizing activity may direct ssDNA intermediates towards error-free homologous recombination.
- This mechanism is crucial for maintaining genome integrity.
Related Concept Videos
Homologous Recombination
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Fixing Double-strand Breaks

