Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Concordance of genomic alterations between primary and recurrent breast cancer
Funda Meric-Bernstam1, Garrett M Frampton, Jaime Ferrer-Lozano
1Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Surgical Oncology, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Pathology, Systems Biology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York; Fundacion para la Investigacion; Departments of Hematology-Oncology and Pathology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia; and INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract:
There is growing interest in delivering genomically informed cancer therapy. Our aim was to determine the concordance of genomic alterations between primary and recurrent breast cancer. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, profiling 3,320 exons of 182 cancer-related genes plus 37 introns from 14 genes often rearranged in cancer. Point mutations, indels, copy-number alterations (CNA), and select rearrangements were assessed in 74 tumors from 43 patients (36 primary and 38 recurrence/metastases). Alterations potentially targetable with established or investigational therapeutics were considered "actionable." Alterations were detected in 55 genes (mean 3.95 alterations/sample, range 1-12), including mutations in PIK3CA, TP53, ARID1A, PTEN, AKT1, NF1, FBXW7, and FGFR3 and amplifications in MCL1, CCND1, FGFR1, MYC, IGF1R, MDM2, MDM4, AKT3, CDK4, and AKT2. In 33 matched primary and recurrent tumors, 97 of 112 (86.6%) somatic mutations were concordant. Of identified CNAs, 136 of 159 (85.5%) were concordant: 37 (23.3%) were concordant, but below the reporting threshold in one of the matched samples, and 23 (14.5%) discordant. There was an increased frequency of CDK4/MDM2 amplifications in recurrences, as well as gains and losses of other actionable alterations. Forty of 43 (93%) patients had actionable alterations that could inform targeted treatment options. In conclusion, deep genomic profiling of cancer-related genes reveals potentially actionable alterations in most patients with breast cancer. Overall there was high concordance between primary and recurrent tumors. Analysis of recurrent tumors before treatment may provide additional insights, as both gains and losses of targets are observed.
Insights
Genomic profiling reveals actionable alterations in most breast cancers, with high concordance between primary and recurrent tumors. Analyzing recurrences offers insights for targeted therapy, as both gains and losses of targets are observed.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Cancer Therapy
Background:
- Growing interest in personalized cancer treatment based on genomic information.
- Understanding genomic alterations in breast cancer is crucial for effective therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the concordance of genomic alterations between primary and recurrent breast cancer.
- To identify actionable genomic alterations for targeted treatment options.
Main Methods:
- Targeted next-generation sequencing of 182 cancer-related genes.
- Analysis of point mutations, indels, copy-number alterations (CNA), and rearrangements.
- Profiling of 74 tumors from 43 patients with matched primary and recurrent samples.
Main Results:
- High concordance (86.6% for mutations, 85.5% for CNAs) between primary and recurrent tumors.
- Actionable alterations detected in 93% of patients, guiding targeted treatment.
- Increased frequency of CDK4/MDM2 amplifications in recurrent tumors.
Conclusions:
- Deep genomic profiling identifies actionable alterations in most breast cancer patients.
- High concordance suggests conserved genomic profiles, but recurrent tumors show distinct alterations.
- Analyzing recurrent tumors can reveal new therapeutic targets and inform treatment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
The Retinoblastoma Gene
The first-ever tumor suppressor gene called Rb was identified in retinoblastoma - a rare eye tumor in children. In inherited forms of the disease, a child inherits one defective copy of the Rb gene, which predisposes them to retinoblastoma. However,...

