Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
A review of pain measures for hospitalized children with cognitive impairment
Quinn R Crosta1, Teresa M Ward, Amy J Walker
1University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Insights
This review examined pain scales for hospitalized children with cognitive impairment. The revised Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale showed the best feasibility for clinical use in acute care settings.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pain Management
- Clinical Assessment Tools
- Child Psychology
Background:
- Assessing pain in non-verbal children with cognitive impairment presents significant challenges in acute care.
- Reliable and valid pain measures are crucial for effective treatment and patient outcomes.
- Existing literature lacks a comprehensive review of pain assessment tools for this vulnerable population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review pain measures for hospitalized children with cognitive impairment who cannot self-report.
- To evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical utility of selected pain assessment tools.
- To identify the most feasible and effective pain measures for acute care settings.
Main Methods:
- Conducted electronic searches to identify relevant published evidence.
- Reviewed studies examining the psychometrics and feasibility of four pain measures: Non-Communicating Child's Pain Checklist-Postoperative Version, Individualized Numeric Rating Scale, Pediatric Pain Profile, and revised Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale.
- Analyzed reported validity, reliability, and feasibility data.
Main Results:
- All four reviewed pain measures demonstrated established validity and reliability.
- Variability was observed in the clinical utility findings across the different measures.
- The revised Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale exhibited strong feasibility in acute care settings.
Conclusions:
- The revised Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale is a valid, reliable, and feasible option for assessing pain in non-verbal children with cognitive impairment in acute care.
- While other measures possess good psychometric properties, their clinical utility may be more variable.
- Further research may explore optimizing the implementation of these tools in diverse clinical environments.
Purpose:
The aims of this review were to examine pain measures for hospitalized children with cognitive impairment who are unable to self-report and to describe the best available evidence for their clinical utility in acute care settings.
Design And Methods:
Electronic searches to identify published evidence were conducted and studies reviewed. Reported psychometrics and feasibility of the Non-Communicating Child's Pain Checklist-Postoperative Version, Individualized Numeric Rating scale, Pediatric Pain Profile, and revised Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale were examined.
Conclusions:
These four measures have established validity and reliability. However, clinical utility findings varied.
Practice Implications:
The revised Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale has demonstrated feasibility in acute care settings related to ease of use, time requirements, and flexibility regarding caregiver input.
More Related Videos
09:38Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016
07:14A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018