Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

10:10
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
43.4K
The evaluation of the failed shoulder arthroplasty
Brett P Wiater1, James E Moravek2, J Michael Wiater3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
|March 13, 2014
Summary
Evaluating failed shoulder arthroplasty is crucial as its incidence rises. A systematic approach using history, physical exam, and diagnostics helps identify causes like infection, wear, or instability for effective treatment.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- The rising incidence of shoulder arthroplasty presents challenges in managing failed procedures.
- Patients often experience pain, limited range of motion, or instability following shoulder arthroplasty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline a systematic approach for evaluating failed shoulder arthroplasty.
- To identify common causes of pain, dysfunction, and instability after shoulder replacement.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive patient history and physical examination.
- Utilizing various diagnostic studies including imaging (radiography, CT, ultrasound), laboratory tests, joint aspiration, and electrodiagnostic studies.
- Systematic review of potential etiologies for early and late implant failure.
Main Results:
- Early pain causes include surgical errors, infection, nerve injury, and complex regional pain syndrome.
- Late pain causes involve chronic infection, component wear, loosening, glenoid erosion, rotator cuff issues, and fracture.
- Poor range of motion stems from rehabilitation deficits, implant problems, and heterotopic ossification.
- Instability is primarily linked to rotator cuff deficiency and implant factors.
Conclusions:
- Diagnosing the cause of failed shoulder arthroplasty requires a thorough, multi-faceted evaluation.
- Etiologies are often multifactorial, necessitating a systematic diagnostic pathway.
- Effective management hinges on accurate identification of the underlying cause(s) of failure.

