Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

The Modified Hole Board - Measuring Behavior, Cognition and Social Interaction in Mice and Rats
Published on: April 8, 2015
HDL hypothesis: where do we stand now?
Sayed M Tariq1, Mandeep S Sidhu, Peter P Toth
1Department of Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA, TariqS@mail.amc.edu.
Insights
Despite evidence linking high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) to lower coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, therapies to raise HDL-C have not consistently reduced cardiovascular events. Current trials show insufficient evidence to recommend HDL-targeted therapy for CAD event reduction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biochemistry
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Epidemiological studies, including the Framingham Heart Study, show an inverse relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk.
- Low HDL-C levels are an independent predictor of subsequent CAD events.
- Despite this, therapeutic attempts to raise HDL-C have not consistently reduced major adverse cardiovascular events like death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the scientific viability of the "HDL hypothesis" which posits that raising HDL-C can lower cardiovascular events.
- To review recent major randomized trials investigating HDL-C-raising therapies and their impact on cardiovascular outcomes.
- To discuss the clinical implications of these findings for modern pharmacotherapy in managing cardiovascular risk.
Main Methods:
- Review of data from major randomized controlled trials including AIM-HIGH, HPS2-THRIVE, ILLUMINATE, and dal-OUTCOMES.
- Analysis of trial outcomes concerning cardiovascular event reduction in patients receiving HDL-C-targeted therapies.
- Consideration of specific patient populations and baseline treatment parameters within these trials.
Main Results:
- Recent trials (AIM-HIGH, HPS2-THRIVE) did not demonstrate a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with stable ischemic heart disease treated with extended-release niacin and simvastatin.
- These trials excluded specific populations, such as those with acute coronary syndromes or significant residual dyslipidemia on suboptimal statin therapy, limiting extrapolation of findings.
- Current clinical trial evidence is insufficient to support HDL-targeted therapy for additional event reduction in CAD patients.
Conclusions:
- The efficacy of raising HDL-C to reduce cardiovascular events remains uncertain.
- Recent trial data raise concerns about the "HDL hypothesis" and its clinical application.
- Further research and careful consideration of patient populations are needed to clarify the role of HDL-C-targeted therapies in cardiovascular disease management.
Abstract:
There is robust epidemiological evidence dating back to the original Framingham Heart Study from 1977 that indicates an important inverse relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and risk of incident coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite this body of scientific information demonstrating that low levels of HDL-C are an independent predictor of subsequent CAD events, multiple therapeutic attempts to raise HDL-C levels have failed to demonstrate a consistent reduction in prognostically important endpoints such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. Recently, several major randomized trials using different therapeutic interventions have raised appropriate concerns about our basic understanding of HDL-C and whether the "HDL hypothesis" of lowering cardiovascular events through therapeutic interventions directed at raising HDL-C is a scientifically viable one. While two recent randomized controlled trials (AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE) failed to show a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients treated to optimally low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at baseline with extended-release niacin on a background of simvastatin, these clinical trials studied specific populations of stable ischemic heart disease patients. The data from these two contemporary trials cannot be extrapolated to all patient populations, such as those with acute coronary syndromes or myocardial infarction or those with significant residual mixed dyslipidemia not treated with optimal doses of intensive statin therapy, as these patients were excluded by trial design in both studies. Therefore, at the present time, there is insufficient evidence from clinical trials to recommend HDL-targeted therapy for additional event reduction in CAD patients. However, we will review the relevant data from recent major trials (AIM-HIGH, HPS2-THRIVE, ILLUMINATE, and dal-OUTCOMES) and highlight the potential clinical implications of these trials in modern pharmacotherapy as it relates to HDL-C raising and potential cardiovascular event reduction.
Related Concept Videos
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
What is a Hypothesis?
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

