Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

419
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
419
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.3K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.3K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.4K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.4K
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

1.2K
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
1.2K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

407
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
407

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the reliability of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Frontiers in psychology·2014
Same author

The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.

Psychological bulletin·2014
Same author

Benefits of testing for nontested information: retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2014
Same author

Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.

Memory (Hove, England)·2014
Same author

On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.

Consciousness and cognition·2011
Same author

Testing effects for common versus proper names.

Memory (Hove, England)·2011
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

10.3K

Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs.

Christopher A Rowland1, Megan K Littrell-Baez, Amanda E Sensenig

  • 1Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA, rowlandc@colostate.edu.

Memory & Cognition
|March 13, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The testing effect, a memory enhancement from retrieval practice, is robust regardless of whether items are studied together or separately. This memory benefit remains consistent across different list designs, indicating its general applicability.

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.1K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

10.3K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.1K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • The testing effect demonstrates that retrieving information enhances memory more than restudying it.
  • The influence of list composition (mixed vs. pure lists) on the testing effect is not well understood.
  • Prior research indicates list design can affect other memory phenomena, like the generation effect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how list composition (mixed vs. pure lists) affects the magnitude of the testing effect.
  • To determine if list design acts as a boundary condition for the testing effect.
  • To compare the testing effect across different list designs.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted manipulating list composition.
  • Participants learned items through study and initial testing, or study and restudy.
  • List designs included intermixed (mixed) and separate (pure) lists for tested and restudied items.

Main Results:

  • Significant testing effects were observed for both mixed and pure list designs across all experiments.
  • No reliable differences were found in the magnitude of the testing advantage between mixed and pure lists.
  • The results indicate list design does not significantly alter the testing effect.

Conclusions:

  • The testing effect is not constrained by list composition, unlike some other memory phenomena.
  • List design does not appear to be a boundary condition that limits the generalizability of the testing effect.
  • Retrieval practice benefits memory consistently, irrespective of how items are organized during learning.