Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Single or multi-channel vaginal cuff high-dose-rate brachytherapy: Is replanning necessary prior to each fraction?
Jessica Zhou1, Joann Prisciandaro1, Choonik Lee1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Purpose:
Adjuvant high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy (VB) is commonly used in endometrial cancer. We evaluated the dosimetric and cost differences of using either a single plan or replan prior to each fraction for single- and multi-channel VB.
Methods And Materials:
We evaluated 84 fractions from 25 patients at our institution (16 single-channel patients each 3 fractions; 9 multi-channel patients each 4 fractions). All fractions were preceded by a computed tomographic (CT) simulation scan, after which a unique treatment plan was generated, dose points per International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) 38. We calculated the dose to critical organs based on a decay-and-treat method utilizing the original catheter dwell-times for the initial fraction, and also the interfractional motion of the critical organ points between the initial and the subsequent CT scans.
Results:
The absolute mean dose difference was 14 cGy for bladder and 15 cGy for rectum between the replan and decay methods for single-channel, and 14 cGy for both organ points for the multi-channel cylinder. The bladder and rectum doses were not found to be significantly different between the replan and decay methods for either single-channel (bladder, P = .08; rectum, P = .19) or multi-channel cylinders (bladder, P = .85; rectum, P = .10). The mean interfractional displacement of the organ points between the initial and subsequent CT scans was 1.10 cm for the bladder and 0.67 cm for the rectum for single-channel, and 0.87 cm and 0.51 cm for multi-channel cylinders. The maximum interfractional motion was seen in the transverse plane for both organ points for both types of cylinders. At our institution, the decay method was 19% and 22% more cost-effective for single-channel and multi-channel cylinders, respectively.
Conclusions:
Our data show no dosimetric advantage, but higher costs, associated with replanning prior to each fraction for both single- and multi-channel VB. Fractional replanning should not be utilized on a routine basis.
Related Concept Videos
Planning Nursing Care I
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

