Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.2K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.7K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.7K
Contingency Table01:29

Contingency Table

4.0K
A contingency table provides a way of portraying data that can facilitate calculating probabilities. It is a method of displaying a frequency distribution as a table with rows and columns to show how two variables may be dependent (contingent) upon each other; The table helps determine conditional probabilities quite quickly and can help systematically organize, analyze and quantify data. The table displays sample values concerning two variables that may be dependent or contingent on one...
4.0K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

37.0K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.0K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.5K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First-onset mental disorders after cancer diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality: a nationwide cohort study.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Surgical and not analgesic technique affects postoperative inflammation following colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized study.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2017
Same author

Background risk of breast cancer influences the association between alcohol consumption and mammographic density.

British journal of cancer·2015
Same author

Variability of total and free IgE levels and IgE receptor expression in allergic subjects in and out of pollen season.

Scandinavian journal of immunology·2015
Same author

A genome-wide association study of rheumatoid arthritis without antibodies against citrullinated peptides.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2014
Same author

The influence of polygenic risk scores on heritability of anti-CCP level in RA.

Genes and immunity·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K

Bounds on causal interactions for binary outcomes.

A Sjölander1, W Lee2, H Källberg3

  • 1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Biometrics
|March 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed new bounds to measure causal interaction between exposures for binary outcomes. This method helps assess the magnitude of interaction, complementing existing statistical tests in epidemiologic research.

Keywords:
Biologic interactionBoundsCausal interactionGene–gene interactionPotential outcomes

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Genetic Epidemiology

Background:

  • Epidemiologic research commonly investigates how multiple exposures interact to influence binary outcomes.
  • Causal interaction occurs when the effect of one exposure on an outcome depends on the level of another exposure.
  • While statistical tests can detect the presence of causal interaction for binary exposures, quantifying its magnitude has been challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive bounds for quantifying causal interaction in epidemiologic studies with binary outcomes and categorical exposures.
  • To provide a method for assessing the magnitude of causal interaction, extending beyond simple presence/absence detection.
  • To develop bounds applicable to exposures with multiple levels and explore their utility with and without assumptions of monotone exposure effects.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of bounds on causal interaction for binary outcomes and categorical exposures.
  • Development of methods applicable to exposures with an arbitrary number of levels.
  • Exploration of bounds under assumptions of monotone exposure effects.

Main Results:

  • Established bounds for causal interaction applicable to a broader range of exposure types and levels.
  • Demonstrated that these bounds can quantify the magnitude of causal interaction, serving as a complement to statistical interaction tests.
  • Successfully applied the derived bounds to analyze gene-gene interactions in rheumatoid arthritis.

Conclusions:

  • The derived bounds offer a novel approach to assessing the magnitude of causal interaction in epidemiologic studies.
  • These bounds are valuable for understanding complex exposure relationships, particularly in areas like genetic epidemiology.
  • The methodology provides a practical tool for researchers investigating the interplay of multiple factors in disease etiology.