Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Establishing, harmonizing and analyzing critical values in a large academic health center
Insights
Harmonizing critical values (CVs) lists across hospitals standardized testing criteria, reducing unnecessary calls by 33%. Periodic review ensures ongoing appropriateness of these essential laboratory safety measures.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Pathology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Lack of standardized processes for critical values (CVs) lists in large academic health centers.
- Absence of long-term validation for harmonized CVs lists.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a process for harmonizing critical values lists across multiple hospital laboratories.
- To validate the effectiveness and appropriateness of CVs lists over a 5-year period.
Main Methods:
- Adopted a standardized definition for critical values.
- Analyzed existing CVs lists and reporting times for chemistry, hematology, and coagulation (CH&C) tests.
- Reviewed and revised CVs lists for compliance and uniformity across campus hospitals.
Main Results:
- Harmonized 37 CH&C tests, eliminating 26 and modifying 61 values.
- Achieved a 33% reduction in critical value calls at a primary teaching hospital.
- Demonstrated stability of the revised list over 5 years, with minor adjustments and one re-instatement.
Conclusions:
- Successful harmonization of critical values lists achieved uniformity and reduced unnecessary alerts.
- Established a framework for periodic review and evaluation of critical values lists.
- Emphasized the importance of ongoing assessment for the appropriateness of critical value thresholds.
Background:
No report on establishing critical values (CVs) lists has described a process for harmonizing different lists in a large academic health center or validation on follow-up after 5 years.
Methods:
A definition of a critical value was adopted. CVs in use and reporting times for chemistry, hematology and coagulation (CH&C) tests during a 1-week period at one hospital were analyzed prior to the revision and again 5 years later.
Results:
CVs lists in use by the different campus hospital laboratories were reviewed for compliance with the definition for a critical value. Lists were harmonized with a total of 37 CH&C tests, five of these included adult and either cord blood or neonatal values. Overall, 26 tests were eliminated, 61 individual values were changed and two tests were added. The revised CVs list reduced the number of calls at one primary teaching hospital by 33%. In the next 5-year period, value thresholds changed (n=2) and one value was re-instated (n=1). When retrospectively examined for impact, one value change was considered appropriate.
Conclusions:
CVs lists were harmonized among campus hospitals. Tests not considered critical were removed and values adjusted for uniformity. Changes in CVs lists should be evaluated for appropriateness. A process is now in place for periodic review and considerations related to CVs lists.
Related Concept Videos
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Patient-centered Care
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Critical Thinking I
Critical Thinking II
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
