Gastrointestinal tract perforation: evaluation of MDCT according to perforation site and elapsed time

Hyun Cheol Kim1, Dal Mo Yang, Sang Won Kim

  • 1Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 149 Sangil-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea, khcppp@khu.ac.kr.

European Radiology
|March 14, 2014
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) accurately predicts gastrointestinal (GI) perforation sites, especially in the stomach and duodenum. Diagnostic accuracy was high regardless of the time elapsed since perforation.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Imaging

Background:

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) tract perforation is a critical condition requiring prompt diagnosis.
  • Accurate localization of the perforation site is crucial for effective surgical management.
  • Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is a key imaging modality in evaluating acute abdominal conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of MDCT in predicting the specific site of GI tract perforation.
  • To evaluate the influence of elapsed time on MDCT's perforation site prediction accuracy.
  • To identify specific CT findings indicative of perforation at different GI tract locations.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 168 patients who underwent MDCT prior to laparotomy for GI perforation.
  • Patients were categorized into early (<7 hours) or late (≥7 hours) groups based on time elapsed.
  • Two independent reviewers analyzed MDCT scans for specific findings like extraluminal air, bowel wall changes, and fat stranding.

Main Results:

  • Overall diagnostic accuracy for perforation site prediction was high (over 91%) with excellent inter-reviewer agreement (kappa 0.86).
  • MDCT demonstrated superior accuracy (over 97%) for stomach and duodenum perforations.
  • Specific CT findings like focal bowel wall discontinuity and mottled extraluminal air bubbles were strong predictors for different perforation sites.

Conclusions:

  • MDCT is a reliable tool for accurately predicting upper GI tract perforation sites.
  • The accuracy of MDCT in predicting perforation sites is not significantly affected by the elapsed time.
  • Utilizing knowledge of specific CT findings enhances diagnostic accuracy for GI perforation.

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
1.1K
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction01:22

Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction

Esophageal perforation is a severe medical condition characterized by a breach in the integrity of the esophageal wall. This breach can occur due to various factors such as trauma, medical procedures, or underlying diseases. When the esophageal wall is compromised, it allows food, fluids, and digestive juices into the chest cavity or adjacent structures, leading to potential complications and health risks.
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
844
Intestinal Obstruction II: Pathophysiology01:07

Intestinal Obstruction II: Pathophysiology

Intestinal obstruction triggers a series of physiological responses, starting with gas and fluid accumulation in the bowel segment proximal to the obstruction, leading to distension. This distended intestine compresses the diaphragm, hindering lung expansion and potentially leading to reduced respiratory effort, atelectasis, and pneumonia.To overcome the blockage, the gut intensifies contractions, causing colicky abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, which reduces fluid and food intake and...
47