[Prevalence of preterm birth according to birth weight group: a systematic review]

Insights

Preterm birth prevalence in Brazil is underestimated by the Live Birth Information System. A new equation corrects these estimates, revealing a higher true prevalence of preterm birth.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Preterm birth is a significant global health concern.
  • Accurate prevalence data is crucial for effective public health interventions.
  • Existing data systems may not fully capture the true incidence of preterm birth.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate preterm birth prevalence across various birth weight categories in Brazil.
  • To develop a correction equation for underreported preterm birth data.
  • To compare corrected estimates with existing national data.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of Brazilian literature (1990-2012) with primary data on birth weight and gestational age.
  • Analysis of 12 selected studies to tabulate preterm prevalence by 100g birth weight increments.
  • Application of sex-specific fractional polynomial equations to derive corrected prevalence estimates.
  • Comparison of corrected estimates with the Live Birth Information System (LBIS) data for 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2011.

Main Results:

  • Primary studies indicated higher preterm birth prevalence than LBIS across all birth weight categories.
  • In 2010, LBIS reported 7.2% preterm birth prevalence.
  • The derived correction equation estimated a 11.7% prevalence in 2010, approximately 38.0% higher than LBIS figures.

Conclusions:

  • The Live Birth Information System underestimates preterm birth prevalence in Brazil.
  • LBIS data requires correction factors to accurately reflect the true magnitude of preterm birth.
  • The proposed correction equation provides a more accurate estimate of preterm birth incidence.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
1.0K
Development of the Oral Microbiota01:28

Development of the Oral Microbiota

The establishment of the oral microbiome begins before birth, challenging the long-held belief that the fetal oral cavity is sterile. The presence of oral microbes such as Streptococcus and Fusobacterium in amniotic fluid suggests that microbial exposure may occur in utero, potentially through translocation from the maternal oral or gastrointestinal tract. This early colonization primes the neonatal immune system and sets the stage for subsequent microbial succession. Maternal health,...
65
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
14.8K