Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Knotless Independent Double-Row Repair and Biceps Augmentation for Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: January 23, 2026
Biomechanical Consequences of Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Techniques on Clavicle Strength
Ulrich J Spiegl1, Sean D Smith2, Simon A Euler3
1Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Background:
Lateral clavicle fractures have been reported after coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstructions with bone tunnels through the clavicle.
Purpose:
To biomechanically compare clavicle strength following 2 common CC reconstruction techniques with different bone tunnel diameters.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
Testing was performed on 2 groups of matched-pair cadaveric clavicles. Clavicles were prepared with either 2.4-mm tunnels and cortical fixation button (CFB) devices or 6.0-mm tunnels with hamstring tendon grafts (TGs) and tenodesis screws; contralateral clavicles were left intact. A 3-point bending load was applied to the distal clavicles at a rate of 15 mm/min until failure. Ultimate failure load and anterior-posterior width of the clavicles 45 mm medial from the lateral border were recorded. Strength reduction was determined as the percentage reduction in ultimate failure load between paired intact and surgically prepared clavicles. Relative tunnel size was determined as the quotient of tunnel diameter and clavicle width, reported as a percentage.
Results:
The TG technique significantly reduced clavicle strength relative to intact (P = .011) and caused significantly more strength reduction (mean, -30.7%; range, 8.1% to -62.5%) than the CFB technique (mean, -3.8%; range, 34.2% to -28.1%; P = .031). The CFB technique was not significantly different from intact (P = .314). There was a significant correlation between clavicle width and strength reduction (τ = -0.36, P = .04) and between relative tunnel size and strength reduction (τ = 0.51, P = .005).
Conclusion:
The TG reconstruction technique with 6.0-mm tunnels, grafts, and tenodesis screws caused significantly more reduction of clavicle strength compared with the CFB technique with 2.4-mm tunnels and CFB device. Additionally, relative tunnel width correlated highly with the strength reduction.
Clinical Relevance:
This information can influence intraoperative decision making based on the individual clavicle width and might influence postoperative treatment protocols. Large bone tunnels may predispose patients to clavicle fractures after anatomic CC reconstructions.
More Related Videos
07:10Modified Long Head of Biceps Tendon Rerouting and Fixation as Partial Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: March 6, 2026
04:27Anterior Capsular Reconstruction with Human Dermal Allograft for Irreparable Subscapularis Tears
Published on: May 9, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Muscles of the Shoulder
Anterior Thoracic Muscles
The anterior thoracic muscles include the serratus anterior, subclavius, and...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...