Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm)
Stacy B Menees1, Eric Elliott1, Shail Govani2
1Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Ann Arbor Veterans' Administration Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Background:
Among average-risk patients, repeat colonoscopy in 5 years is recommended after 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) adenomas are found on screening colonoscopy or in 10 years if hyperplastic polyps are found. However, sparse quantitative data are available about adherence to these recommendations or factors that may improve adherence.
Objective:
To quantify adherence to recommended intervals and to identify factors associated with lack of adherence.
Design:
Retrospective endoscopic database analysis.
Setting:
Tertiary-care institution and Veterans Affairs Health System.
Patients:
Average-risk individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy found to have 1 to 2 small polyps on screening colonoscopy.
Main Outcome Measurements:
Frequency of recommending repeat colonoscopy in 5 years if 1 to 2 small adenomas are found and in 10 years if hyperplastic polyps are found.
Results:
Of 922 outpatient screening colonoscopies with 1 to 2 small polyps found, 90.2% received appropriate recommendations for timing of repeat colonoscopy. Eighty-four percent of patients with 1 to 2 small adenomas and 94% of patients with 1 to 2 hyperplastic polyps received recommendations that were consistent with guidelines. Based on logistic regression analysis, patients aged >70 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-5.7), fair bowel preparation (OR 12.7; 95% CI, 7.3-22.4), poor bowel preparation (OR 10.0; 95% CI, 4.3-23.6), and the presence of 2 small adenomas versus 1 small adenoma (OR 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2-6.0) were factors associated with "overuse" or recommendations inconsistent with guidelines.
Limitations:
Retrospective study design.
Conclusion:
More than 90% of endoscopists' recommendations for timing of surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small polyps are consistent with guideline recommendations. Quality of preparation is strongly associated with deviation from guideline recommendations.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
04:09The Pocket-Creation Procedure of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Rectal Laterally Spreading Tumors
Published on: February 13, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy