Higher quality of molecular testing, an unfulfilled priority: Results from external quality assessment for KRAS

Lien Tembuyser1, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg2, Nicola Normanno3

  • 1Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Insights

External quality assessment for KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer revealed significant genotyping errors and missing clinical interpretations. This highlights the need for improved molecular pathology services to ensure accurate precision medicine in oncology.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Pathology
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Precision medicine relies on accurate molecular diagnostics, with RAS mutational status being critical for anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
  • The European Society of Pathology established an annual KRAS external quality assessment (EQA) program to ensure high-quality molecular pathology testing services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the quality of routine KRAS testing provided by laboratories participating in the 2012 EQA program.
  • To identify common genotyping errors and deficiencies in clinical reporting for KRAS mutations in mCRC.

Main Methods:

  • Ten samples (8 mCRC tissue, 2 cell line) were distributed to over 100 laboratories across 26 countries for routine KRAS testing.
  • Genotyping results and clinical reports were independently evaluated for accuracy and completeness.

Main Results:

  • Twenty-seven percent of laboratories incorrectly genotyped at least one sample, with errors including false negatives, false positives, and misidentified mutations.
  • Less than 5% of all distributed specimens had genotyping errors.
  • Twenty percent of laboratories reported technical errors, and many clinical reports lacked essential elements like clinical interpretation and method sensitivity.

Conclusions:

  • The KRAS EQA program identified substantial room for improvement in molecular testing quality for mCRC.
  • EQA is crucial for identifying and rectifying errors, serving as an educational tool to enhance diagnostic services.
  • Standardization and quality assurance are vital as new biomarkers are integrated into clinical practice.

Related Concept Videos