Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatic Fibrosis Diagnosis Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography and AI
Published on: July 21, 2023
Prospective evaluation of FibroTest®, FibroMeter®, and HepaScore® for staging liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B:
Vincent Leroy1, Nathalie Sturm2, Patrice Faure3
1Clinique Universitaire d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Pôle DIGIDUNE, CHU de Grenoble, France; Unité INSERM/Université Grenoble Alpes U823, IAPC Institut Albert Bonniot, Grenoble, France.
Insights
Fibrosis blood tests show similar diagnostic performance for hepatitis B and C. However, these tests may underestimate significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in hepatitis B patients, requiring careful interpretation.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Diagnostic Accuracy
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Fibrosis blood tests are validated for chronic hepatitis C but less documented for hepatitis B.
- Accurate staging of liver fibrosis is crucial for managing viral hepatitis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of FibroTest®, FibroMeter®, and HepaScore® for liver fibrosis in hepatitis B versus hepatitis C.
- To assess the accuracy of non-invasive fibrosis markers in hepatitis B infection.
Main Methods:
- A study included 510 patients with mono-infection of hepatitis B or C, matched for fibrosis stage.
- Liver biopsy was performed, and histological lesions were staged using the METAVIR classification.
- Blood tests for fibrosis were conducted on the day of liver biopsy.
Main Results:
- Overall diagnostic performance was similar between hepatitis B and C, with AUROC values for fibrosis stages ranging from 0.75 to 0.87.
- Optimal cut-offs for fibrosis tests were consistently lower in hepatitis B, leading to decreased sensitivity and negative predictive values.
- Underestimation of significant fibrosis (F≥3) was more frequent in hepatitis B patients (41-47%) compared to hepatitis C patients (6-26%).
Conclusions:
- Non-invasive blood tests demonstrate comparable overall diagnostic performance for liver fibrosis in both hepatitis B and C.
- There is a higher risk of underestimating significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in hepatitis B patients.
- Adjusting cut-offs may not fully correct for the underestimation of fibrosis in hepatitis B.
Background & Aims:
Fibrosis blood tests have been validated in chronic hepatitis C. Their diagnostic accuracy is less documented in hepatitis B. The aim of this study was to describe the diagnostic performance of FibroTest®, FibroMeter®, and HepaScore® for liver fibrosis in hepatitis B compared to hepatitis C.
Methods:
510 patients mono-infected with hepatitis B or C and matched on fibrosis stage were included. Blood tests were performed the day of the liver biopsy. Histological lesions were staged according to METAVIR.
Results:
Fibrosis stages were distributed as followed: F0 n=76, F1 n=192, F2 n=132, F3 n=54, F4 n=56. Overall diagnostic performance of blood tests were similar between hepatitis B and C with AUROC ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 for significant fibrosis, 0.82 to 0.85 for extensive fibrosis and 0.84 to 0.87 for cirrhosis. Optimal cut-offs were consistently lower in hepatitis B compared to hepatitis C, especially for the diagnosis of extensive fibrosis and cirrhosis, with decreased sensitivity and negative predictive values. More hepatitis B than C patients with F ⩾3 were underestimated: FibroTest®: 47% vs. 26%, FibroMeter®: 24% vs. 6%, HepaScore®: 41% vs. 24%, p<0.01. Multivariate analysis showed that hepatitis B (0R 3.4, 95% CI 1.2-19.2, p<0.02) and low γGT (OR 7.3, 95% CI 2.0-27.0, p<0.003) were associated with fibrosis underestimation.
Conclusion:
Overall the diagnostic performance of blood tests is similar in hepatitis B and C. The risk of underestimating significant fibrosis and cirrhosis is however greater in hepatitis B and cannot be entirely corrected by the use of more stringent cut-offs.
More Related Videos
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
10:10Measurement of Liver Stiffness Using Atomic Force Microscopy Coupled with Polarization Microscopy
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Cirrhosis I: Introduction
Cirrhosis II: Pathophysiology
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Hepatitis