Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Three-dimensional and chemical changes on the surface of a 3-year clinically retrieved oxidized titanium dental
Raúl González-García1, Alberto Monje2, María Coronada Fernández-Calderón3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain; FEDICOM, Foundation for the Study and Development in Implantology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Badajoz, Spain.
Objective:
To report the main topographical features in the micro- and nano-scales and to assess implant chemical changes of the surface of a 3-year clinically retrieved oxidized titanium dental implant, and compare them with a similar, unused implant.
Materials And Methods:
The surface of the oxidized titanium dental implants was assessed by surface electron microscopy (SEM) analysis at increasing magnifications. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement was performed to analyze the implants surface chemistry. XPS spectra were acquired before and after sputtering with an Ar(+) ion etching of 3keV.
Results:
With a length of 10-40μm, and a width of 0.05-0.1μm, numerous cracks were ubiquitous along the implant surfaces. Chimney-like structures formed micropores between 1 and 5μm, with up to 40% of them partially or totally broken in the retrieved implant. In relation to chemical composition, Ti and O were predominant in both the unused and in the retrieved implant. N was present in high concentrations (11.49at%) at the retrieved implant surface, in contrast with those observed for the unused implant (1.14at%). Also, C was present in higher concentrations in the retrieved implant surface, while drastically decreased following the sputter-cleaning process.
Conclusion:
While cracks were ubiquitous present from the manufacturing, broken chimney-like structures forming micropores in the clinically retrieved implant may be attributable to excessive mechanical friction forces during the insertion of the implant. Chemical composition of the implant surface may be subjected to changes because of the in vivo environment, with increase of N and C, and decrease of Ca and P.
More Related Videos
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
03:10Pilot In Vitro Study to Assess Cleaning Ability and Effects of Different Decontamination Methods on Implant Surfaces
Published on: November 21, 2025