Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kendall's Tau Test01:16

Kendall's Tau Test

1.1K
Kendall's tau test, also known as the Kendall rank coefficient test, is a nonparametric method for assessing association between two variables. This test is particularly useful for identifying significant correlations when the distributions of the sample and population are unknown. Developed in 1938 by the British statistician Sir Maurice George Kendall, the tau coefficient (denoted as τ) serves as a rank correlation coefficient, with values ranging from -1 to +1.
A τ value of +1...
1.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

716
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
716
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.4K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

27.9K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
27.9K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

729
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
729
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Statistical inference for saved time based on disease progression curves in Alzheimer's disease research.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same author

Lithium's effects on serum neurofilament light in Parkinson's disease: A post hoc analysis.

IBRO neuroscience reports·2026
Same author

Statistical models for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: Lessons learned from the DIAN-TU Platform Trial.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Penalized estimation of linear transformation models for interval-censored data with time-dependent covariates.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Impact of male genital tract infections on semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same author

Testing disease progression under the proportional reduction in decline in Alzheimer's disease studies.

Journal of applied statistics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Exact approaches for testing hypotheses based on the intra-class kappa coefficient.

Gregory E Wilding1, Joseph D Consiglio, Guogen Shan

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|March 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces exact testing methods for the intra-class kappa coefficient, improving agreement assessment for categorical ratings. These new approaches offer better type I error control compared to traditional asymptotic methods, especially in specific sample sizes.

Keywords:
exact testingintra-class kappanuisance parametersunconditional tests

More Related Videos

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
07:28

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

Published on: December 19, 2016

20.9K
Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE
07:10

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE

Published on: April 21, 2019

15.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
07:28

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

Published on: December 19, 2016

20.9K
Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE
07:10

Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE

Published on: April 21, 2019

15.9K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The intra-class kappa coefficient is crucial for assessing agreement in categorical ratings.
  • Existing significance testing methods often rely on asymptotic null distributions, leading to issues with type I error control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate exact testing approaches for the intra-class kappa coefficient.
  • To address the limitations of asymptotic methods in controlling type I errors.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed exact testing procedures for one-sample and K-sample scenarios.
  • Utilized exact distribution of the test statistic conditional on a sufficient statistic for p-value computation.
  • Investigated unconditional approaches by maximizing across the nuisance parameter space.

Main Results:

  • Exact testing approaches demonstrate improved type I error control compared to asymptotic methods.
  • Exact unconditional procedures show particular advantages in numerical evaluations.

Conclusions:

  • Exact testing offers a more reliable alternative for assessing agreement with categorical ratings.
  • The proposed exact unconditional methods provide superior performance in statistical testing scenarios.