Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

07:05
Behavioral Disturbances: An Innovative Approach to Monitor the Modulatory Effects of a Nutraceutical Diet
Published on: January 3, 2017
9.2K
Suboptimal choice by dogs: when less is better than more.
Kristina F Pattison1, Thomas R Zentall
1Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.
Animal Cognition
|March 19, 2014
Summary
The less is more effect, a cognitive bias, was observed in dogs. When offered a choice, dogs preferred a single slice of cheese over cheese plus a carrot slice, demonstrating this effect in a new species.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Comparative Psychology
- Animal Cognition
Background:
- The "less is more" effect, a form of affect heuristic, is documented in humans and non-human primates.
- This effect describes the tendency to devalue a set of items when a less desirable item is added, even if the total value should increase.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the presence of the "less is more" effect in a social, non-primate species: domestic dogs.
- To determine if dogs exhibit similar valuation biases as observed in humans and monkeys.
Main Methods:
- Dogs were presented with choices between food items.
- The primary experiment involved offering dogs a choice between a slice of cheese and a combination of cheese plus a slice of carrot.
- Dogs' preferences were recorded based on their selections.
Main Results:
- Dogs readily consumed both cheese and carrots.
- When given a choice, the majority of dogs preferred a single slice of cheese over a slice of cheese accompanied by a slice of carrot.
- This indicates a preference for the simpler, more valuable option.
Conclusions:
- The "less is more" effect was demonstrated in domestic dogs.
- This finding suggests that this cognitive bias may be more widespread across species than previously understood.
- The study contributes to understanding the evolution of decision-making and valuation processes.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
11.8K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
11.8K
Limits to Natural Selection
30.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
30.0K
Types of Selection
37.5K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
37.5K
Spare Receptors
4.9K
Some receptors remain unoccupied even when an agonist produces a maximal response. Such empty ones are called spare receptors. In presence of spare receptors the maximum effect of an agonist drug is achieved with fewer than 100% of the receptors being occupied. To determine the presence of spare receptors, scientists often compare the concentration of the drug needed to produce 50% of the maximum effect (EC50) with the concentration of the drug needed to occupy 50% of the receptors (Kd). If the...
4.9K
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
10.2K
Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and...
10.2K
Conservation of Small Populations
14.4K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
14.4K

