Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.7K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.5K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.5K
Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

8.3K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
8.3K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

659
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
659

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harnessing ensemble models for improved lactation curve modeling: The R package EMOTIONS.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Asyndromic surveillance of New York City emergency department diagnoses with the tree-temporal scan statistic.

Journal of public health research·2026
Same author

MSPOCK: Alleviating Spatial Confounding in Multivariate Disease Mapping Models.

Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics·2026
Same author

Influence diagnostics in the Heckman selection models based on EM algorithms.

Journal of applied statistics·2025
Same author

Innovative use of self-controlled methods for the evaluation of waning effectiveness of the COVID-19 monovalent third dose: comparison with a test-negative design.

Vaccine·2025
Same author

A multivariate generalized logistic approach with spatially varying nonlinear components for modeling epidemic data.

Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.2K

Relative risk estimates from spatial and space-time scan statistics: are they biased?

Marcos O Prates1, Martin Kulldorff, Renato M Assunção

  • 1Statistics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 30123-970, Brazil.

Statistics in Medicine
|March 19, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Spatial scan statistics can overestimate disease cluster relative risk, especially with low statistical power. However, prospective space-time scan statistics show a downward bias in relative risk estimates.

Keywords:
biasrelative riskscan statisticspace-time statisticsspatial statistics

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

16.5K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.2K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

16.5K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in Public Health

Background:

  • Spatial and space-time scan statistics are established methods for detecting disease clusters.
  • While effective at identifying clusters, the accuracy of estimated relative risk within these clusters has not been thoroughly evaluated.
  • Understanding potential biases in relative risk estimates is crucial for accurate public health assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate potential bias in relative risk estimates derived from spatial and space-time scan statistics.
  • To investigate how statistical power influences the bias in these estimates.
  • To compare bias patterns between purely spatial/space-time scan statistics and prospective space-time scan statistics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of bias in relative risk estimates from purely spatial and space-time scan statistics.
  • Evaluation of bias under varying levels of statistical power.
  • Assessment of bias in prospective space-time scan statistics.

Main Results:

  • Purely spatial and space-time scan statistics show an upward bias in relative risk estimates for low-power clusters, which becomes negligible with medium to high power.
  • Prospective space-time scan statistics exhibit a consistent downward bias in relative risk estimates, increasing with the power to detect clusters.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of scan statistic method impacts the accuracy of relative risk estimation.
  • Researchers must consider potential biases, particularly the upward bias in purely spatial/space-time methods and the downward bias in prospective methods, when interpreting cluster relative risks.