Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Automated Modular High Throughput Exopolysaccharide Screening Platform Coupled with Highly Sensitive Carbohydrate Fingerprint Analysis
Published on: April 11, 2016
Comparison of different gum-based thickeners using a viscometer and line spread test: a preliminary study
Jae Hyeon Park1, Ho-Geun Kim1, Byung-Mo Oh1
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Fluid thickeners like guar gum (GUA) and xanthan gum (XAN) show varying viscosities based on concentration and measurement conditions. Viscosity differences between GUA and XAN increase with concentration, but line spread tests show similar results.
Area of Science:
- Food Science and Technology
- Rheology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Fluid thickeners are crucial in food and pharmaceutical industries for modifying texture and stability.
- Starch polysaccharide (STA), guar gum-based polysaccharide (GUA), and xanthan gum-based polysaccharide (XAN) are common thickeners with distinct properties.
- Understanding their rheological behavior under various conditions is essential for effective application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the rheological properties of starch polysaccharide (STA), guar gum (GUA), and xanthan gum (XAN) based fluid thickeners.
- To evaluate the influence of different measurement conditions (concentration, shear rate, temperature) on thickener viscosity.
- To assess the correlation between viscometer measurements and line spread test (LST) results.
Main Methods:
- Viscosity measurements using a rotational viscometer at varying shear rates (1.29-103 s⁻¹) and temperatures (35°C).
- Exclusion of STA due to time-dependent viscosity alterations.
- Line spread tests (LST) conducted on GUA and XAN at different concentrations (1.5%-3.0%) and temperatures (20°C, 35°C).
Main Results:
- Viscosities of 1% GUA and XAN were similar, but differences increased with higher concentrations.
- Xanthan gum exhibited a more pronounced shear-thinning effect compared to guar gum.
- LST results showed no substantial differences between GUA and XAN, despite varying viscosities.
Conclusions:
- Fluid thickener viscosity is highly dependent on measurement conditions (e.g., shear rate, temperature, concentration).
- A single measurement method (viscometer or LST) may not be sufficient for comparing different thickeners.
- Clinical and industrial decisions regarding thickener selection require a comprehensive evaluation of rheological data and expert opinion.
Related Concept Videos
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models II

