Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Detecting Migration and Infiltration of Neutrophils in Mice
Published on: February 6, 2020
Distinct inflammatory mediator patterns characterize infectious and sterile systemic inflammation in febrile
Christine Wennerås1, Lars Hagberg2, Rune Andersson2
1Department of Hematology and Coagulation, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Background:
Invasive infections and sterile tissue damage can both give rise to systemic inflammation with fever and production of inflammatory mediators. This makes it difficult to diagnose infections in patients who are already inflamed, e.g. due to cell and tissue damage. For example, fever in patients with hematological malignancies may depend on infection, lysis of malignant cells, and/or chemotherapy-induced mucosal damage. We hypothesized that it would be possible to distinguish patterns of inflammatory mediators characterizing infectious and non-infectious causes of inflammation, respectively. Analysis of a broad range of parameters using a multivariate method of pattern recognition was done for this purpose.
Methods:
In this prospective study, febrile (>38°C) neutropenic patients (n = 42) with hematologic malignancies were classified as having or not having a microbiologically defined infection by an infectious disease specialist. In parallel, blood was analyzed for 116 biomarkers, and 23 clinical variables were recorded for each patient. Using O-PLS (orthogonal projection to latent structures), a model was constructed based on these 139 variables that could separate the infected from the non-infected patients. Non-discriminatory variables were discarded until a final model was reached. Finally, the capacity of this model to accurately classify a validation set of febrile neutropenic patients (n = 10) as infected or non-infected was tested.
Results:
A model that could segregate infected from non-infected patients was achieved based on discrete differences in the levels of 40 variables. These variables included acute phase proteins, cytokines, measures of coagulation, metabolism, organ stress and iron turn-over. The model correctly identified the infectious status of nine out of ten subsequently recruited febrile neutropenic hematology patients.
Conclusions:
It is possible to separate patients with infectious inflammation from those with sterile inflammation based on inflammatory mediator patterns. This strategy could be developed into a decision-making tool for diverse clinical applications.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Inflammation II: Local and Systemic Effects
Inflammatory Response I: Vascular and Cellular
Acute Inflammation I: Inflammatory Response
Inflammation
Inflammatory Response II: Inflammatory Exudate and Tissue Repair
The typical wound exudate is odorless, transparent, straw-colored, thin, and watery. Exudate, however, can differ depending on the state of wound healing. Likewise, the...
Acute Inflammation I: Cellular Phase

