Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers01:24

Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers

1.8K
Local anesthetics (LAs) block the sodium channels of nerve trunks, sensory nerve endings, and neuromuscular junctions. Although LAs can block all kinds of nerves, the sensitivity of nerve fibers differs according to nerve types and structures. LAs are known to block myelinated fibers faster than unmyelinated ones. Also, they block pain or sensory neurons at low concentrations without affecting the motor neurons involved in muscle contractions. This helps relieve labor pain without affecting the...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter: Commentary: Neurapraxia in Time and Space.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Application of a Clinical-Electrophysiological Model for Identifying Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy in an Australian Cohort.

Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS·2026
Same author

Sensitivity of Nerve and Skin Biopsy and Fat Aspirate for Amyloid in Symptomatic Hereditary ATTR Amyloidosis With Peripheral Neuropathy.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Pre-Plexal Extension of Parsonage-Turner Syndrome With Nerve Root Involvement on Needle Electromyography.

Journal of clinical neuromuscular disease·2026
Same author

Clinical Insights Into CASPR1 and CASPR1/Contactin-1 Complex Autoimmune Nodopathies.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Neurapraxia in Time and Space.

Neurosurgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Functional and Physiological Methods of Evaluating Median Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
12:09

Functional and Physiological Methods of Evaluating Median Nerve Regeneration in the Rat

Published on: April 18, 2020

15.6K

Proficiency of nerve conduction using standard methods and reference values (Cl. NPhys Trial 4).

William J Litchy1, James W Albers, James Wolfe

  • 1Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.

Muscle & Nerve
|March 20, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Standardizing nerve conduction (NC) assessments with reference values and abnormality levels significantly reduces interobserver disagreement. This improves diagnostic consistency for clinical neurophysiologists in therapeutic trials and practice.

Keywords:
multicenter trialnerve conduction accuracynerve conduction proficiencyneuropathy impairment scorereference values

More Related Videos

Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity
07:42

Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity

Published on: April 26, 2012

18.1K
In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurement of the Rat Ulnar Nerve with Axonal Excitability Testing
04:56

In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurement of the Rat Ulnar Nerve with Axonal Excitability Testing

Published on: February 6, 2018

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Functional and Physiological Methods of Evaluating Median Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
12:09

Functional and Physiological Methods of Evaluating Median Nerve Regeneration in the Rat

Published on: April 18, 2020

15.6K
Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity
07:42

Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity

Published on: April 26, 2012

18.1K
In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurement of the Rat Ulnar Nerve with Axonal Excitability Testing
04:56

In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurement of the Rat Ulnar Nerve with Axonal Excitability Testing

Published on: February 6, 2018

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Previous studies indicated significant interobserver variability in nerve conduction (NC) assessments.
  • Intraobserver differences were found to be non-significant in prior trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate methods for reducing interobserver disagreement in NC.
  • To improve agreement among clinical neurophysiologists using standardized protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Trial 4 investigated the impact of written instructions, pretrial agreement, standard reference values, and percentile values on NC measurements.
  • Evaluated the effect of these modifications on interobserver disagreement and judgment of abnormality.

Main Results:

  • Modifications decreased, but did not eliminate, interobserver differences in NC attributes.
  • Standard reference values and defined percentile values of abnormality reduced disagreement and improved judgment agreement.
  • Recommended that the same clinical neurophysiologist perform repeat NCs for therapeutic trial patients.

Conclusions:

  • Utilizing common standard reference values and defined percentile levels of abnormality effectively decreases interobserver judgment differences.
  • These standardized approaches provide a rationale for their implementation in therapeutic trials and clinical practice.